Welcome to rascott.com.
This is a personal site that reflects my interests in news, current affairs,
aviation and travel.
email me at
robert@rascott.com
Up
Now In Dubai
Scott Consulting

Photo Albums
My
photographs have been moved off this site and are now stored on Picasa. They
were simply taking up too much space on my web host.
Please use
this link to see my list of photo albums.
Some
Useful links:
Information:
Met Office Volcano watch
World Time Clock
Exchange Rates
Journalism:
ForeignPolicy
Nationsonline.org
Project Syndicate
Amnesty International
Reporters w/o borders
The Guardian - UK
BBC World News
CNN Asia
Bangkok Post
Daylife.com - news
Gulf News
Arabian Business
Good causes:
Sister
Joan - Bangkok
Regional Info:
BKK Magazine
HK Magazine
In
Singapore Magazine
TimeOut Dubai
Travel:
Circle of Asia
Tales of Asia
Smart Travel Asia
Finance:
FinanceAsia
Aviation:
Amadeus (airline
schedules)
Airliners
- aviation forum
Flight Aware
Thailand Info
thailand.com
learningthai.com
sawadee.com
bangkok a-z
Back in the UK:
Newton Ferrers
Government:
The
"new" White House
Photography
Denis Olivier - black and white
And for fun:
Lin Ping live panda tv
EarthCam
History
BBC Archive
National Media
Museum
The British Library
Imperial War Museum

The opinions expressed on these pages are entirely personal unless they are
credited; you may not agree with all, or anything, that I write. So please use
the
feedback
page to
respond, comment or berate me.
| |
Ethiopia: More aid, more hunger still (2004)
|
|
By Michael Buerk
BBC correspondent, This World
|
Twenty years ago the BBC's reports on Ethiopia's "biblical" famine sparked
an unprecedented international aid effort, so why are more Ethiopians facing
starvation now than in 1984?
It is nearly 20 years now since I flew north from Addis Ababa, with the
legendary cameraman, Mohamed Amin, into the greatest natural disaster of the
twentieth century.
It was compounded by man, of course.
The Marxist military regime of Colonel Haile-Mariam Mengistu and the
infamous Derg, was cruel even by African standards.
The wars they were fighting with the rebel movements of the north turned
the highlands into battlegrounds and cut the starving off from the outside
world.
The outside world did not care very much. The West was not keen to help a
soviet-backed tyranny during one of the last spasms of the Cold War.
The result was a crisis that tipped into catastrophe.
Scattered bodies
When the autumn rains failed, the highlanders left their homes in millions
and trekked away to look for help. We found their bodies scattered over the
mountainsides.
| |
It was something unimaginable that we had allowed to happen,
doing nothing would mean you were complicit in murder
Bob Geldof
|
Those that survived the journey, made it to places like Korem and
Mekele on the great spinal road north where help might have been, if help had
come.
But it hadn't, and tens of thousands of them died there instead.
Korem is still just a couple of rows of mostly single storey mud and stick
buildings with corrugated iron roofs.
In 1984 we arrived there at night and got up before dawn to find 40,000
starving people out in the open.
Save the Children had set up a small supplementary feeding centre for
babies, but it was completely overwhelmed.
There was a French doctor from Medecins Sans Frontières, bewildered and
crying.
"I know nothing of politics", she told me, "I am just a witness of Korem
and thousands, millions of these people are going to die."
They were already dying all around her; the keening and wailing cut right
to your heart.
'Murder'
Two decades later, Bob Geldof is still emotional about what he saw that
night in his home in Chelsea. "It was something unimaginable that we had
allowed to happen. Doing nothing would mean you were complicit in murder".
It was not just Geldof, by the end of that week the whole country seemed to
be mobilising.
We tracked down the little girl in Liverpool who saw her mum crying in
front of the TV and went out on the streets with her brother, dressed as a
guy, for five days running and collected £87, more money than she had ever
seen before.
We found the Cambridgeshire farmer who could not stand the contrast with the
grain mountains he was helping to build up. He set up a charity that raised
£2m and sent 12,000 tons of food to the Horn of Africa.
As Geldof says, there was "never a civic movement in history that was so
rapidly assembled, so focused and determined, so attuned to the objective".
For once, everybody thought they could do something; that they could make a
difference. Was it something about them? The visible scale of their suffering,
the helplessness of their mass victimhood?
Or was it something about us? Did it catch us at a moment in the middle of
the Thatcher and Reagan years when our prosperity seemed suddenly selfish and
uncaring?
It was Geldof who articulated the anger and harnessed the sympathy. Do they
know it's Christmas?, the song he scribbled in the back of a taxi and
persuaded the country's biggest stars to sing, sold 50 million copies.
Live Aid, the following summer, was not just the greatest concert ever
held; it was the biggest shared event in human history. Sport Aid, a year
later was the world's biggest-ever sporting occasion; 20 million people ran
for Africa and raised $100 million.
What good did it all do? If nothing else, it saved between a million and
two million lives, but we did not solve Ethiopia's problems.
Population explosion
The population in the highlands has exploded. It is heading for double the
size it was in 1984.
The ever-rising numbers are putting more pressure on the land, pushing
people further up the mountains to the margins of fertility.
| |
Ethiopia: Now and then
Average income in 1984: $190
Average income today: $108
Six million Ethiopians are fed by international aid each year
Annual population rise: 2.7%
Annual topsoil loss: 2.7%
|
The thin soil is exhausted; the trees that bound it to the hillsides have long
since been chopped down for firewood. When it is dry it blows away as dust and
on satellite pictures you can sometimes see a red cloud heading out over the
Indian Ocean.
When it rains, the topsoil is swilled away by the rivers. All Ethiopia's
rivers run dark brown.
There's a chilling symmetry in the statistics; the percentage rise in
population is exactly the same as the percentage loss of topsoil; both 2.7% a
year.
Some things have improved. The great civil wars ended in the early 90s, the
Derg fell and Mengistu fled, to be sheltered in Zimbabwe by his fellow tyrant,
Mugabe.
The rebels were Marxists, too, but the then new Prime Minister, Meles
Zenawi, and his senior colleagues all enrolled for an Open University MBA
course.
They did not abandon their political roots altogether, but modified their
policies or at least their image, to fit a world where capitalism was
triumphant.
They have been in power for more than 10 years now and have been accused of
human rights abuses, of vote-rigging, systematic oppression and wasting up to
$2m a day on a pointless war with Eritrea.
Peasants 'kept poor'
Even though a lot of this may be true, they are saints compared with the
Derg. The big indictment against them is that the poor are getting poorer.
| |
The worst thing is to starve, the next worst thing is to beg
Ethiopian PM Meles Zenawi
|
Ethiopia's Government is ideologically, even romantically, focused on the
peasants amongst whom they lived during the long years of war. They genuinely
want them to have a better life but, crucially, they insist that they stay
peasants.
Meles Zenawi says the alternative would be disastrous. "Allowing peasants
to sell their land in conditions of recurring drought would mean they would
sell under duress and descend on the towns in their millions."
The government's critics say it's all about power. It is easier to control
people stuck on their land, whose livelihood can be taken away from them by
the stroke of a party worker's pen, than a rootless and disgruntled city
population.
The government's stated strategy is "agriculture-led development". The idea
is to make the peasants more prosperous so an indigenous industry grows up
naturally, financed by the new spending power of the rural population.
So far it has been a failure.
The peasants are a great deal poorer than they were in 1984. They lost
everything then and most have not been able to replace the possessions, tools
and animals that went in the famine.
Average annual income then was $190; now it is $108. Food production per
head is estimated to have fallen from 450 kgs in 1984/5 to 140 kgs in 2002/3.
Even in an average year six million Ethiopians now have to be fed by the
outside world.
Ethiopia has received more relief aid in the past 20 years than any other
country on earth. But it has had less development aid than any other needy
nation.
Prime Minister Zenawi finds it humiliating. "The worst thing is to starve",
he told me. "The next worst thing is to beg".
Ethiopia: A Journey with Michael Buerk was broadcast in the UK on BBC
Two on Sunday, 11 January, 2004 at 2100 GMT.
Africa calling
Leader
Friday February 27, 2004
The Guardian
Africa remains a stain on the conscience of the world's wealthy nations.
While they have enjoyed 20 years of growth and prosperity, Africa has
gone backwards. Many parts of the continent remain desperately poor and
- thanks to the deadly ravages of HIV/Aids and poverty - have seen the
life expectancy of their citizens shrink. In Botswana and Swaziland, for
example, the average lifespan has fallen by 20 years since the 1970s.
Half of all Africans still live in absolute poverty. For all the good
intentions of governments in Europe, Asia and America, things continue
to get worse.
In this context, the pessimistic view is that Tony Blair's new
commission for Africa is likely to achieve little, other than provide
another catalogue of failures. There is certainly no lack of analysis of
Africa's problems: yesterday the UN announced that 6.5 million people in
southern Africa were at risk of starvation and that it had raised just
half of the $640m required for relief. Meanwhile, the UN's trade and
development agency said African countries relying on sales of
commodities such as coffee were in a "poverty trap", unable to earn
enough from exports to finance growth. At this rate, the millennium
development goals agreed in 2000 remain far off.
There is a slim chance that Mr Blair's commission can surprise the
pessimists. The fact that Mr Blair himself is to chair the commission
gives it weight - although the lack of similar backing from Germany, the
US or Japan will weaken its impact. What the commission will need to do
is give the Group of Eight leading economies clear, authoritative
guidance - so that political pressure can be applied to those G8 members
that are currently dragging their heels.
Africa's problems are manifold, yet there are solutions that must be
attempted. What Africa's poorest nations need first is a complete
cancellation of debt, combined with substantial increases in aid to
battle poverty, disease, and a crippling lack of infrastructure. Second,
Europe and the US must remove their tariff barriers on commodities, or
compensate the farmers of Africa for the absurd situation that has seen
the doubling of subsidies to American cotton farmers in the last decade.
Third, the donor-recipient relationship must be improved to give simple,
predictable levels of assistance, avoiding the situation where some
African countries have more than 50 separate donors, each with their own
set of conditions. Finally, the G8 nations must examine their own
record, and address why their aid commitments have fallen so short in
the past.
|
Brand new aid
If the new Commission for Africa turns out to be another
anodyne and meaningless gesture, I'm out of there. And I will weep
Bob Geldof
Friday February 27, 2004
The Guardian
Africa, that sublime continent a bare eight miles from Europe's southernmost
shores, is so utterly mired in such totality of decay that only a
fundamental rethink of all that has gone wrong while trying to put things
right will suffice.
I'm not sure Tony Blair's new
Commission for Africa, which he announced yesterday, will be able to do
that, but it should, and it is what I, as one of the commissioners, am
interested in achieving.
The prime minister accepts the
logic of "Why the successes, and why the failures?". Africa's problems can't
only be the result of corruption, debt, Aids and conflict. We have such
problems in spades - it's just that we're rich enough to surf them. Down
there they die.
Next year presents an incredible
opportunity for action: the prime minister of the world's fourth largest
economy as chair of the G8, and Britain as president of the EU. For most of
that year, Blair will be one of the most influential politicians on the
planet - if not the most. How should Britain mark this unique moment?
In the past two years, we have,
for good or ill, flexed our financial and military muscle. How wonderful now
to stretch our minds. Let London be the intellectual capital of the world
for a few months. This cannot just be about economics. This must be about
the cultural, philosophical and psychological framework that has defined our
relationship with Africa.
Gather the thinkers and writers,
the development geeks and economy wonks, the culture gurus and activist
freaks. Let's consider anew our relationship with the powerless, mute and
denied.
Imagine it is 1904, and we
Edwardians have decided to convene a commission to discuss the 20th century.
Could we have anticipated the world of 1950? It would have been impossible.
We would not have invited Mr Freud, and we certainly wouldn't have taken
into consideration the works of Mr Darwin, or that awful Mr Marx. We would
have been operating under the political exigencies of the post-Waterloo
world, not the unfelt philosophies of our actual moment.
Since the end of the cold war
everything has changed; 9/11 was not the moment, 9/11 was the consequence.
In the late 1970s, a commission
chaired by Willy Brandt was asked by the World Bank to look into the
relationship between the north and the south. It produced a brilliant report
that became the benchmark for development up to the demise of the cold war.
But neither Brandt nor his fellow commissioners, including Ted Heath, were
in power at the time, so no one of political consequence paid much heed.
Africa has inherited its poverty
and conflicts in a long, baleful chain of history. But its agony has been
compounded by the chill winds of the globalised world, which has effectively
excluded it further. Globalisation in principle should help the poor. The
reality, taking place in an "unethical vacuum", as a new UN report has it,
has proved the opposite.
Debt, trade, tariffs, subsidies
and Aids (the first globalised disease) have devastated the continent.
The Commission for Africa, a body
independent of government, must aggregate all current and forward thinking,
all extant and as yet unpublished reports, into its framework; it must take
the many tributaries of ideas and allow them to flow into the more powerful
flood of the commission. It must avoid the deadening jargon and acronyms
behind which we hide the reality of failure. People must want to read its
report, understand it and debate its findings in order to demand that when
it is delivered to the top table at our G8, its findings be acted upon. That
is the one, key difference from all other reports. The commission has real
political power. This is a generational opportunity.
Politicians roll their eyes at my
highfalutin bollocks, but I will fight all year that it should be as I have
written and as I have described it to the prime minister and the chancellor.
And I am asking for your help in a constant demand for a fundamental and
radical rethink of our deadly tango with Africa. If this turns out to be
another anodyne and meaningless developmental tract, I'm out of there. And I
will weep.
This is an amazing and powerful
thing for Britain to do. I like Brown and Blair as men. Whatever you read
about the cynicism and spin behind this commission, it's simply not true. In
many private conversations over many years, both these men have been
ferociously impassioned on this issue. It was stupid for a Tory shadow
minister to sneer that "Blair thinks he can save Africa". He knows he can't;
but like most of us, if he could, he would. Blair wants to help. This should
not be about party politics. This is something we don't have to argue about.
The prime minister knows how
ultimately limited the response of any one nation can be. This will not
distract from the domestic agenda or Iraq. It is preposterous to suggest so.
Nor will the problem be solved simply by money (though that'll go a long
way). Something more fundamental needs to be addressed.
This is a brave, fantastic use of
power, and it will be a report card back to the generation that, through a
rock concert, found an issue nowhere on the global political agenda and
forced it to the very top, where it has remained for 20 years.
No sneering, please. Let's go for
it. Give us a hand. Britain should, in an unambiguously clear, good way, be
proud of itself.
· Bob Geldof is a musician
who has worked on African issues for 20 years
www.data.org
|
Africa's seemingly endless
famine.
The current famine in Africa will
claim millions of lives. Foreign aid will help; but that provides only temporary
respite. It is the developed world itself that perpetuates these famines; they
are as much the result of human action (or inaction) as they are the weather.
Yes, dictatorship and war can
starve a nation or a continent. The starving millions in Zimbabwe are testament
to that dictator's use of hunger as a political weapon.
But the West must be aware of its
responsibility; and much of that comes down to so called free trade. The
evidence is compelling: to prosper Africa has to sell its produce. But George
Bush pledged a further US$ 180 million to support US farmers over the next
decade. The European Union spends over one half of its budget (some gbp 70
billion) on agricultural subsidies. For the Western consumer this means higher
prices and higher taxes. For the Africans, it means hunger and death.
Another contribution to food aid
helps of course; but admitting Africa into the global economy will help far
more.
|