rascott.com  "news, views, travel and an occasional blog"

 

 

The 2002 Archive

Feedback:by email   

Home
2002 in review

 

Click for Dubai, UAE Forecast

Other Useful links

World Time Clock Exchange Rates Nationsonline.org
Amnesty International
Reporters w/o borders
Sister Joan - Bangkok

BKK Magazine

The opinions expressed on these pages are entirely personal unless they are credited; you may not agree with all, or anything, that I write. So please use the feedback page to respond, comment or berate me.

 

 

 

  The 2002 Archive

2002 Summary

2002 in review highlights from the year and thoughts on the year ahead

The holiday period from 23 December 2002 - Nestle, do they know its Christmas. A special Christmas offering

period from 2 December 2002 - Cheriegate, Henry Kissinger, the Iraq weapons report and using video to help football referees.

week commencing 25 November 2002 - Cultural naivety; the Saudi reality; A cool yule for the politically correct !; the Hong Kong Open golf tournament

week commencing 18 November 2002 - Thailand's corruption scandals; webstats; US state department calls for Article 23 white paper; the Miss World fiasco.

week commencing 11 November 2002 - The royal victims of a circulation war; the evil weed; the dot com bubble; Can low cost airlines fly in Asia, the China aviation market; one country - two systems holding back Hong Kong; Chungking Express; life in the big city.

week commencing 4 November 2002 -  The Royal Victims of a Circulation War; Settling down - an old fashioned notion! What did the butler see?: Hong Kong 6s: Misguided prejudice: Attack of the drones; a Republican agenda; the long march to capitalism.

week commencing 28 October 2002 - Cost cutting companies, publish a white bill for Article 23, comprendez-vous les French, Upstairs, Downstairs a very British fetish, Asia's sleaze city.

week commencing 21 October 2002 - The HKG/USA air services pact, Pyongyang's nuclear threat, Nobel Peace prize, Jiang's Texas BBQ, What is the right response to terrorism?

week commencing 14 October 2002 - the forgotten casualties of Bali, Iraq's scad free election, England's hooligans, not so able Seaman, new HKG/USA air services pact.

week commencing 7 October 2002 - Bali bombing, Singapore's self controlled media; calling time on the monarchy in Canada, Inconsistency in Hong Kong

week commencing 30 September 2002 - A Major liking for a late night Currie, Bill Clinton wows Blackpool, Fetish Fashion legal costs, False Miracles, Mosquitoes - an evil cult !

week commencing 23 September 2002 - German elections, Peter Enckelmann - who would be a goalkeeper, the Ryder Cup.

week commencing 16 September 2002 - Iraq and North Korea - spot the difference; Vanessa Mae; School Daze revisited.

week commencing 9 September 2002 - Watford FC, Nigerian cash advance frauds, School Daze party

Remembering 9-11 - a series of articles on the anniversary of the 11 September attacks on the USA

week commencing 2 September 2002 - The death penalty, the end of my Time subscription, Cathay and Dragonair, how bad is Saddam Hussein?

week commencing 26 August 2002 - Media censorship in China, Bloomberg's Singapore folly, the Earth Summit

week commencing 19 August 2002 - Whipped into shape - the fetish fashion verdict, Aviation features, Hong Kong

week commencing 12 August 2002 - Letter from Havana, Aviation features, John Barnes

week commencing 5 August 2002 - Taiwan and China, top ten travel destinations from HKG, Cathay Pacific pilots, Hong Kong blues and a golf joke !

week commencing 29 July 2002 - England, a mainland view of Hong Kong, and Pet Shop Pensioners

weeks commencing 15 and 22 July2002 - Smokers rights (none), asteroids, notes from the UK, the Ashes schedule for Australia Oct 2002-Jan 2003.

week commencing 8 July 2002 - Arming airline pilots, leadership and Hong Kong news

week commencing 1 July 2002 - World Cup, Oh Canada, USA Independence Day,

weeks commencing 17 and 24 June 2002 - Garbage in Hong Kong, air and rail travel in the USA and the state of the union.

week commencing 8 June 2002 - Hong Kong open skies, new fines and customer service

period commencing 1 June 2002 - Tianenmen, the World Cup, South Asia - on the verge of nuclear war and the state of Hong Kong's museums.


Period from 23 December 2002

Nestle - do they know its Christmas?

24 December 2002

In 1984, appalled by film of the famine in Ethiopia, Sir Bob Geldorf wrote Do they Know its Christmas; he cajoled, encouraged and persuaded the hit list of British 1980s pop to perform the song; and all proceeds went to acquire and ship food and medical supplies to Ethiopia.

The song was released in November of 1984, and immediately debuted at Number One in Great Britain, and was Number One on the American charts two weeks later. The song sold fifty million copies worldwide. Midge Ure was the co-producer, and he personally accompanied the first relief shipment of over $70,000 worth of food and medical supplies to Ethiopia, in March 11, 1985.

Now 18 years on the lessons have not been learned.

The multinational coffee, cereal and confectionery company, Nestle, is demanding US$ 6 million from the Ethiopian government.

Ethiopia is fighting its worst famine for 20 years. It is the poorest country in the world. The average annual income is US$ 100. One in every ten new born children will not see their first birthday. The government has acknowledged its legal liability but argues that it simply cannot afford the repayment but has offered US$ 1.5 million to settle the claim.

The background is slightly complicated. In 1975 the then military government in Ethiopia nationalised the Ethiopian Livestock Development Company, which at that time was owned in part by a German company, the Schweisfurth Group. Schwiesfurth was acquired by Nestle in 1986. It is a fair bet that the recoverability of an 11 year old debt was a discount to the purchase price. If it was not then the due diligence was negligent.

Oxfam state that US$ 6 million would feed over one million people for a month. The Ethiopian prime minister believes that 6 million of his people already need emergency food aid. That number increase daily.

There has been a three year drought. Crops have failed. And ironically, the price of coffee has collapsed. Coffee production supports one quater of Ethiopia's population. Nestle is the worlds largest coffee producer.

Oh yes, Nestle's 2001 profits were US$ 5.5 billion.

Under intense public pressure Nestle is now talking about investing the repayment back into Ethiopia. But it is not yet talking about waiving the debt.

The assets in Ethiopia were nationalised 25 years ago. Nestle did not even own the company at the time. The company is trying to make cash out of a debt that it surely wrote of many years ago.

Nestle's employees and shareholders must be hugely embarrassed. A quick climb down, an apology and a contribution of US$ 6 million to famine relief in Ethiopia would win Nestle many friends. Until then I strongly suggest that you boycott their products.

You can also write to the company using the following link.

http://www.maketradefair.com/spage/english/action14.asp?subcat=1&cat=1&select=1&special=yes

The lyrics to Do They Know Its Christmas:             


1: It's Christmas time
There's no need to be afraid
At Christmas time
We let in light and we banish shade
And in our world of plenty
We can spread a smile of joy
Throw your arms around the world
At Christmas time

2: But say a prayer
Pray for the other ones
At Christmas time it's hard
But when you're having fun
There's a world outside your window
And it's a world of dread and fear
Where the only water flowing
Is the bitter sting of tears
And the Christmas bells that ring
There are the clanging chimes of doom
Well tonight thank God it's them instead of you

Feed the world
Let them know it's Christmas time
Feed the world
Do they know it's Christmas time at all?

3: And there won't be snow in Africa
This Christmas time
The greatest gift they'll get this year is life
Where nothing ever grows
No rain nor rivers flow
Do they know it's Christmas time at all?

Feed the world
Let them know it's Christmas time
Feed the world
Let them know it's Christmas time again

BRIDGE:
(Here's to you) raise a glass for everyone
(Here's to them) underneath that burning sun
Do they know it's Christmas time at all?

END: Feed the world
Let them know it's Christmas time

Useful Links for this story:

A list of Nestle Products:  http://www.nestle.co.uk/about/brands/

Oxfam: http://www.oxfam.org/eng/

Right sizing Christmas

Sadly this is not an rascott.com original - it is far too funny to be from me !

Twelve Days of Christmas Memo

CORPORATE MEMO

To: All Staff
Date: December 1
Subject: New "Twelve Days of Christmas" Policy


The recent announcement that Donner and Blitzen have elected to take the early reindeer retirement package has triggered a good deal of concern about whether they will be replaced, and about other restructuring decisions at the North Pole.

Streamlining is due to the North Pole's loss of dominance in the season's gift distribution business. Home Shopping TV channels and mail order catalogues have diminished Santa's market share. He and the Board could not sit idly by and permit further erosion of the profit picture.

The reindeer downsizing was made possible through purchase of a late model Japanese sled for the CEO's annual trip. Improved productivity from Dasher and Dancer, who summered at the Harvard Business School, is anticipated. Reduction in the reindeer will also lessen airborne environmental emissions for which the North Pole has received unfavorable press (gas and solid waste).

We're pleased to inform you that Rudolph's role will not be disturbed. Tradition still counts for something at the North Pole!

Management denies, in the strongest possible language, the earlier leak that Rudolph's nose gets red, not from the cold, but from substance abuse. Calling Rudolph "a lush who was into the sauce and never did pull his share of the load" was an unfortunate comment, made by one of Santa's helpers and taken out of context at a time of the year when they are known to be under 'executive stress'.

As for further restructuring, today's global challenges require the North Pole to continue to look for better, more competitive steps. Effective immediately, the following economy measures are to take place in the "Twelve Days of Christmas" music subsidiary:

1) The partridge will be retained, but the pear tree, which never produced the cash crop forecasted, will be replaced by a plastic hanging plant, providing considerable savings in maintenance;

2) Two turtle doves represent a redundancy that is simply not cost effective. In addition, their romance during working hours could not be condoned. The positions are, therefore, eliminated;

3) The three French hens will remain intact. After all, everyone loves the French;

4) The four calling birds will be replaced by an automated voice mail system, with a call waiting option. An analysis is underway to determine who the birds have been calling, how often and how long they talked;

5) The five golden rings have been put on hold by the Board of Directors. Maintaining a portfolio based on one commodity could have negative implications for institutional investors. Diversification into other precious metals, as well as a mix of T-Bills and high technology stocks, appear to be in order;

6) The six geese-a-laying constitutes a luxury which can no longer be afforded. It has long been felt that the production rate of one egg per goose per day was an example of the general decline in productivity. Three geese will be let go, and an upgrading in the selection procedure by personnel will assure management that, from now on, every goose it gets will be a good one;

7) The seven swans-a-swimming is obviously a number chosen in better times. The function is primarily decorative. Mechanical swans are on order. The current swans will be retrained to learn some new strokes, thereby enhancing their outplacement;

8) As you know, the eight maids-a-milking concept has been under heavy scrutiny by the EEOC. A male/female balance in the workforce is being sought. The more militant maids consider this a dead-end job with no upward mobility. Automation of the process may permit the maids to try a-mending, a-mentoring or a-mulching;

9) Nine ladies dancing has always been an odd number. This function will be phased out as these individuals grow older and can no longer do the steps;

10) Ten Lords-a-leaping is overkill. The high cost of Lords, plus the expense of international air travel, prompted the Compensation Committee to suggest replacing this group with ten out-of-work congressmen. While leaping ability may be somewhat sacrificed, the savings are significant as we expect an oversupply of unemployed congressmen this year;

11) Eleven pipers piping and twelve drummers drumming is a simple case of the band getting too big. A substitution with a string quartet, a cutback on new music, and no uniforms, will produce savings which will drop right to the bottom line;

Overall we can expect a substantial reduction in assorted people, fowl, animals and related expenses. Though incomplete, studies indicate that stretching deliveries over twelve days is inefficient. If we can drop ship in one day, service levels will be improved.

Regarding the lawsuit filed by the attorney's association seeking expansion to include the legal profession ("thirteen lawyers-a-suing"), a decision is pending.

Deeper cuts may be necessary in the future to remain competitive. Should that happen, the Board will request management to scrutinize the Snow White Division to see if seven dwarfs is the right number.

Happy Holidays !

Period from 2 December 2002

Cheriegate - never lie to the media !

14 December 2002

How Cherie Blair must regret being introduced to Peter Foster, the convicted fraudster who helped her purchase two apartments in Bristol, in the South West of England.

While no one has suggested that anything illegal took place it is the judgment of Ms Blair, and by association the Prime Minister, that has come under focus.

The underlying concern, and expect this to figure prominently in Mr. Foster's revelations, is that in return for his help, Ms Blair interceded on Foster's behalf in his extradition hearings from the UK, possibly using the influence of No 10 Downing Street,

When the government's press office initially denied Foster's involvement they lied. And there is nothing more damaging than lying to the very resourceful British media. They are like sharks; they smell a weakness and attack. Leaked e-mails confirmed Foster's involvement and the saga has continued from there.

He has now sold his story to a frenzied media and new revelations are inevitable.

Downing street has come to a halt for two weeks. Iraq, Firemen strikes and other events of import, have been relegated to also-rans while Tony Blair and his advisors go full tilt into damage limitation mode ! Ms Blair's tearful and rather theatrical apologies were hopefully genuine rather than misleading the British public further.

Many of us continue to wish Blair's government well. The alternatives are too frightening to consider. There are elements of the British Press that abhor the very idea of Labour rule - even of new Labour rule. The Mail on Sunday and The Scotsman have both  been at the forefront of the mud-slinging.

The trouble is that  Downing Street, the Prime Minister and his wife failed  to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth from the outset. The public are still not convinced that the truth his now being told. The government's credibility has been weakened.

The Guardian, a newspaper that harbours much goodwill for the government wrote yesterday that,

"Cheriegate is not just about Mrs Blair, her role and judgment. It is also, in a resonant way, about New Labour as a whole. The affair is a catalyst for a wider reflection on the tone and dignity of the government, its leaders, its methods and perhaps even its moral compass."

What the Blairs need to do now is avoid a siege mentality; they need to be public and accountable. They are not being hounded by politicians in the way Bill Clinton was. They are being hounded by parts of the media. The best that they can do is use that media to win back public confidence and support.

 

The short lived return of Henry Kissinger

14 December 2002

Daniel Patrick Moynihan in A Dangerous Place, his book about the United Nations, said of Henry Kissinger: ''Henry does not lie because it is in his interest to lie. He lies because it is in his nature to lie.''

Kissinger' track record includes the Vietnam war, the secret bombing of Cambodia and the overthrow of the Chilean president Salvador Allende and his replacement with General Agusto Pinochet.

So why on earth did George Bush appoint a man with a legendary reputation for deception to head the so-called independent commission to study the World Trade Center disaster? Did he expect that Kissinger will add credibility to the report? Or rather, did he hope that Kissinger will cover up what needs to be covered up?

These questions may be less relevant given that Kissinger has resigned as head of the commission citing conflicts of interest with his consulting business. That in itself is worrying since it is widely believed that his consulting clients include Saudi rulers; and the Saudi links to the September 11th attack on the US have never been fully investigated.

One guarantee; the findings of the commission can now be delayed until after the 2004 elections.

Kissinger remains dogged by allegations of war crimes. These are documented at this site. He is also (remarkably) a winner of the Nobel peace prize, as documented here.

Iraq's weapons report rejected by the USA

14 December 2002

Hijacked by the US government on its arrival at the United Nations this 12,000 page document could have been 12,000 blank pages given the predictability of the US reaction.

The Bush administration has already dismissed Iraq's weapons declaration as woefully short of facts. "We know that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction and has programs to create more," the State Department said.

There is an inevitability about war with Iraq. It is not will there be a war as when will there be a war. Saddam's 12,000 page report has been described as the longest suicide note in history. US intelligence says Saddam is lying. The UN inspectors will be allowed to run around for a while. Eventually the UN inspectors will be given access to US intelligence. And they will find something that is sufficient for the UN to acquiesce while the US and Britain attack.

The only way to disarm Saddam is to depose him and by extension to kill (or capture) him.

The US government clearly links the war on Iraq (WI) to the war on terrorism (WT). In Washington they consider it is just a matter of time before the next terrorist attack takes place in their country. The connections between al-Qaida and Saddam are clearly tenuous, but to the US they are very real. The US is the world's only superpower. It is a role that frankly the country is too immature and too self centered for them to carry such a burden of responsibility.

Helping the W***** in the Black.

14 December 2002

It is widely known that football referees enjoy low digit IQs. Why else would they do a job that pays so badly and where they endure endless abuse.

And in many cases that abuse is deserved. The favourite chants from the terrace of "who is the w***** in the black" are testament to the affection we all have for football referees.

Now if the referees are bad; the linesmen are disgraceful. This evening Manchester United were leading beleaguered West Ham United 2-0 just before half time. West Ham look to have scored; a goal that might change their fortune and the direction of the game. The linesman flags for offside; he is looking at the middle of the pitch where the action is; he is not looking five yards in front of him where O'Shea, the United defender, is playing Defoe onside by about three yards. It was a shocking decision. But it is also a decision that could have been over ruled by video evidence within seconds. The goal should have been allowed.

The technology is there; use it. At the highest level, the players and their fans deserve the best decision making. A fourth official looking at television monitors is a must for premier, european and international football. It is a travesty that it is not already in use.

Week of  25 November 2002

Thoughts on the Hong Kong Open Golf Championship

29 November 2002

Sport or pastime?

I spent yesterday at the first round of the Omega sponsored Hong Kong Open golf tournament.

The big question is can golf be called a sport?

I used to think of a sport as being defined by whether someone could go further, faster, higher than their opponent; or score more than their opponent. It is that element of competition that defines a sport.

But can a sport be something that you can do when smoking? And so many golfers puff their way around a golf course! I wonder whether a pro golfer can elect to play in a smoking or non smoking group.

Hong Kong's event woes

The open golf is being held at the Hong Kong Golf Club (no longer royal!) in Fanling. It is an old parkland course. And it is not in the best of condition. The course had to be radically changed this year after some of the greens became diseased. So we are left with a short par 69 course that has far too many short par 4s which the pros play as a fairway wood and a short iron. It is a test of target golf not suited to the big hitters.

And the remaining greens are still poor. They are not championship standard. Hong Kong can clearly host an event. The trouble is it does not have world class, or even top class, facilities.

Why golf is so dull to watch

Watching golf is like walking around a library; you are surrounded by people going "shush" at you all the time. I swear the caddies would stop the birds from singing if they could. And the marshals can hear a whisper at 100 yards.

Why not change the game completely. Encourage shouting and chanting. Make it like a football match and there may be a few people turning up. I must have been almost the only paying visitor yesterday. The other five people and a dog who were there (the weather was not good) all had guest passes, players guest passes, press passes or members passes.

Can you imagine the referee trying to silence a 60,000 crowd at Old Trafford as a penalty is taken. It requires the same concentration as a three foot putt. So lets have some noise and some fun on the golf course...choruses of "there is only one Jose-Maria...."

Good value from the big names

The one piece of good news was seeing Messrs Faldo and Olazabal running a golf clinic for local kids some 5 hours after they had both finished their morning rounds. The kids loved it and the players looked relaxed. Now I assume they are both on appearance money from the sponsors and the clinic was part of the package; but it was good to see.

Its a cool yule in the land of political correctness

26 November 2002

My regular reader will know that I am fond of most things Canadian. Toronto is a wonderfully multicultural city; its residents come form all over the world and they speak over 100 different languages.

But there are times when the politically correct, and emotionally naive, make the city of Toronto and the country look very sad and dull indeed.

Toronto city officials last week decided to call the 50-foot tree set up outside City Hall a "holiday tree." The mayor was forced to intervene amidst the general scorn.

"Our special events staff went too far with their political correctness when they called it a holiday tree," said Mayor Mel Lastman. "They were trying to be inclusive and their hearts were in the right place, but you can't be politically correct all the time."

The name change led to complaints from Christians and left many non-Christians wondering what all the fuss was about. The most sensible words came from Anita Bromberg of the Jewish group B'nai Brith Canada who said "to take a generic term, slap it on a symbol that really only has significance to one religion...and then say we're being multicultural does not really fit...whatever you call it, it's still a Christmas tree."

And its not just the city of Toronto; The Royal Canadian Mint has a commercial in which it changes the old holiday standard "Twelve Days of Christmas" to "Twelve Days of Giving."

This sense of righteousness is so unnecessary. Accepting people for what they are and where they are from and then enjoying their holidays and festivities is what makes for a vibrant society. The politically correct have no joy, no sense of fun, and will bring us all down to the lowest common denominator.

The sad reality of Saudi Arabia

25 November 2002

The US have allowed the Saudi government to play for both sides for far too long. The US have sought Saudi assistance in a future war with Iraq. Yet at the same time the US has tolerated the Saudi's complicity with anti-Western fundamentalists.

Simply to hold onto their authority the Saudi ruling party have provided shelter for terrorist activity. Now, and this is no great surprise, there is increasing evidence that the Saudis have been funding terrorism. Fifteen of the 19 hijackers of 11 September were from Saudi Arabia; 125 inmates at Camp X-ray, which holds the al-Qaeda suspects at Guantanamo Bay, are from Saudi Arabia.

Saudi leaders "have to decide which side they're on," Senator Joe Leiberman  said on CBS' Face the Nation. "For too many generations they have pacified and accommodated themselves to the most extreme, fanatical, violent elements of Islam, and those elements have now turned on us and the rest of the world."

Leiberman is a sensible and moderate democrat. He has been leading an independent commission investigating the attack on the US.

Why has the US tolerated the Saudi regime. Saudi sits on 3/4 of the world's oil reserves. There is no better reason.

Cultural Naivety

25 November 2002

We are all too naive. It is time to listen to the wake up call. The gulf between cultures is, post September 11, 2001, wider than it has ever been. And we move further away from understanding and tolerance to distrust and enmity. On both sides the call is now a call to arms, it is not a call to peaceful exchange and goodwill.

Two simple examples. A culture where a woman can be stoned to death for adultery clearly contains elements that will not be enthused by a parade of female flesh or the "modernity" it promises. To hold the Miss World Contest during Ramadan compounded the insult.

This is the same cultural naivety exposed by the bombing of the Sari club in Bali. One clubber mourned the passing of the club on a website, saying "it was the United Nations of decadence" without any sense that this is what made it a target.

It is not acceptable for the west to assume that its values are paramount and that its values can be exported anywhere in the world. The usual western apology is is that because no harm is meant, no offence should be taken.

We may well be in a new era of Muslim fundamentalism. Bin Laden is alive and well. His call to arms to British Muslims in a letter published over the weekend in Britain has put that country on its highest level of alert. Suspicion and mistrust and commonplace. In the face of such threats freedom and the truth are the first casualties.

There has been a western arrogance that assumes that western interests and values are self evidently desirable. It is time for greater sensitivity. Tolerance, equality and democracy are true values. Western pop culture, beauty pageants, corporate big business, are best left at home.

Week of  18 November 2002

The Miss World fiasco - time to end this anachronism

24 November 2002

It never made any sense for the Miss World contest to be held in Nigeria. What has happened is that the Miss World pageant has fanned the flames of communal hatred and left more than 200 people dead. The organisers can deny it all they like; but their event was the catalyst.

It was of course that country's right to be the host as it is the home of the reigning Miss World. But it made no sense to hold a beauty contest in the middle of the holy month of Ramadan in a country that is tearing itself apart between the Sharia law of the Muslims and the nation's other faiths and its constitution. What were the organisers thinking ?

The Sharia law has been established in 12 of Nigeria's 31 states, all in the impoverished north of the country.

The government insists that the Sharia law is illegal; the government is ignored and the Sharia law is extended not just to the Muslim populations in these states but to Nigeria's christians and other indigenous faiths.

The death penalty is meant to be confirmed throughout the country by the Federal Court. But the Sharia courts regularly impose the ultimate penalty and death sentences have been carried out without recourse to the federal court and without federal government intervention.

Meanwhile a woman, Amina Lawal has been sentenced to death by stoning for having had a baby outside marriage; the sentence to be carried out when she has weaned her daughter. Her appeal to a higher Sharia court has been dismissed.

The Sharia courts routinely sentence prisoners to amputation of limbs and flogging. Yet such punishments are in direct defiance of the Nigerian constitution, which forbids 'cruel and inhuman punishment'.

And then the Miss World contestants arrive. Some refused to go to Nigeria because of the Lawal case. This in itself brought about an increase in (adverse) publicity to the event in the north.

On 17th November the ThisDay newspaper ran an article in support of the pageant and pouring scorn on Muslim criticism of the event.

Despite three front page apologies the Muslim population of Kaduna rioted; ThisDay's offices were torched; the newspaper editor has been arrested and the spreading riots have taken some 200 lives and displaced thousands from their homes.

The beauty queens have now left for London; the event has no UK sponsor and no television support. Lets hope it now goes away for ever.

Meanwhile back in Nigeria just maybe the events of the last week will focus the country's 120 million people on a more peaceful future.

The US calls for a white paper for article 23 in Hong Kong - how ironic !

23 November 2002

The US state department issued a statement yesterday calling for the SAR government in Hong Kong to issue a white paper for public consultation with the exact wording of the proposed Article 23 legislation.

The fact that the US government has made this statement indicates just how serious the issue of Article 23 is.

It also indicates that the SAR government has to date done a poor job of "selling" the proposed legislation and answering the genuine questions and concerns of interested parties.

The USA certainly has a right to be an interested party. Many US citizens are resident in Hong Kong. The article 23 proposals may impact on their personal freedoms.

The trouble is that this is simply not the right time for the USA to be preaching to the rest of the world on the subject of individual freedoms ! This is the country that assassinated alleged terrorists in Yemen without trial. A country deeply fearful of attacks on their homeland, deeply suspicious of foreigners (except Tony Blair, Mr. Bush's favourite poodle), A country that in its fear is embracing the harsh policies of the ultra right wing and a country where Donald Rumsfeld can command a near bottomless budget.

Domestic criticism of the US government is almost non existent. If you are not with us you are against us is the message.

The US State Department may just need to check what is happening in their own country before they start to tell the SAR government what to do !

Webstats for rascott.com

23 November 2002

I am occasionally asked if anyone actually looks at this website.

Well, someone must do; and more would always be welcome. On 13th November there were 684 hits on the site; not all me, I promise. The highest number of unique visits was 41 on November 11th. For November there are on average 20 visits a day and 216 hits.

These may not be huge numbers but out of small acorns grow great oak trees.....

Thank you to all of you who do log onto this site and check out my latest ranting ! Do come back soon - and tell your friends !

Continuing Thai scandals will wear down investors

22 November 2002

Thailand is a wonderful country. Its people are talented and resilient. It deserves a government that can live up to its pre-election promises and deal head on with the rising tide of corruption.

Today's Bangkok Post is very revealing. The three leading stories on the front page stories include:

B27 million (say US$650,000) a year creamed from highway toll revenues, the latest on the lamyai (a fruit) mortgage scandals, collusion in a state firm to inflate a property's purchase price.

Another recent scam include flood victims being given fake compost for use on their farms.

The trouble with each of these conspiracies is that they appear to involve politicians, civil servants and business people acting in unison. And the credibility of the government for its citizens and for foreign investors starts to look very shakey.

There is a National Counter Corruption Commission (not unlike the ICAC in Hong Kong). This Commission needs the support of the Prime Minister and his cabinet. It needs to be visibly seen to be working and to be working quickly and effectively.

 

Week of  11 November 2002

"Chungking Express" - a timeless tale of surviving life in the big city !

17 November 2002

Sight & Sound Magazine (the monthly magazine of the British Film Institute) asked fifty leading UK film critics for their best films from the past 25 years. In this survey published last week, Chungking Express directed by Wong Kar-Wai came in at number eight, the highest placing of any Asian film.

Released in 1994 this was one of the first Hong Kong films that I saw after coming here and it was the start of my very one sided love affair with Faye Wong.

The simple summary of the film is that there are two stories, two lovelorn cops, two objects of desire: one a big-time heroin dealer in deep trouble with her bosses after the cargo disappears (Brigette Lin), the other a seriously flaky bartender (Faye Wong) who inadvertently gets hold of the keys to Officer 663's (Tony Leung) apartment. The movie is shot in a breathless kaleidoscope of colour and hand-held camerawork to create a mesmerising portrait of Hong Kong in the 1990s.

The following review is from the Los Angeles Times (8 March 1996). If you have not seen this film, and you have any interest in Hong Kong, then read this review and rush out to find a copy of the movie.


'Express' Takes Stylish Look at Love

By KEVIN THOMAS, TIMES STAFF WRITER

 
     Wong Kar-Wai's "Chungking Express" is as fresh as falling rain, a pair of love stories full of pain and humor. Shot fast and sometimes furiously on crowded Hong Kong streets, it speaks in its own highly personal shorthand, expressed through the most fluid of cameras and punctuated with bold whooshes of color and potent bursts of American pop music.
     While so much of the Hong Kong cinema we get to see is either period fantasy or modern action-thriller in the martial arts genre, "Chungking Express" ravishingly, seductively exudes the immediacy of everyday life as its spins its classically timeless tales of love lost and almost regained. Wong has the kind of utterly unpredictable style that brings to mind two other distinctive filmmakers, Quentin Tarantino (who is presenting this film) and Jim Jarmusch.
     A handsome, sweet-natured young policeman (Takeshi Kaneshiro), known only as Badge No. 223, tells us that he has come within "0.01 meter" of a mysterious woman (Brigitte Lin) wearing sunglasses, trench coat and a blond wig and will fall in love with her 57 hours later. While he is nursing his pain at the loss of his lover, who left him exactly one month before, the blond is rushing around Chungking Mansions, a huge maze-like tenement/bazaar in the claustrophobic tourist heart of Hong Kong. She's setting up a drug-smuggling deal with some Indian merchants only to have them double-cross her with the bravura of a magician's vanishing act, endangering her life. By the time she and No. 223 cross paths at a bar, she's prepared only to drink herself into oblivion.
     As "Chungking House," as Part I is called, comes to its deft conclusion, No. 223 introduces us to another woman, Faye (Faye Wang), with whom he also comes within "0.01 meter." Faye has just taken a job at the Midnight Express--that's also the title of Part II--a snack bar in the trendy Lan Kwei Fong district frequented not only by No. 223 but another cop, No. 633 (Tony Leung), who has just received a Dear John from his beloved. (This is the boyish Tony Leung, not to be confused with the taller, sleeker actor of the same name best known for "The Lover.")
     Gawky, very young, uncertain of what to do with her life but determined to find out, Faye, who has a Jean Seberg "Breathless"-style haircut, grows concerned about the despondent police officer. She has started falling in love with him but is too unsure of herself to say so. Instead, she sneaks into his apartment, subtly rearranging it in an attempt to cheer him up (but which makes him think he must be losing his mind for sure).
     You strongly suspect that Wong must have suffered his own romantic loss to feel the need to express it through not only one but two men, whom he gives funny quirks. No. 223 has a thing for canned pineapple, discovering he wants to buy only cans with a May 1 expiration date, which is also his 25th birthday, the age when people start becoming aware of their mortality. Beyond May 1 is too painful to contemplate for No. 223, too indicative that his lover has definitively left him, too suggestive that everything in life may have an expiration date. Similarly, No. 663 finds himself pouring his heart out to inanimate objects in his tiny apartment.
     Wong has as wonderful a way with actors as he has with a camera--certainly, his virtuoso cinematographer Christopher Doyle deserves a deep bow here, as does his clutch of mood-establishing composers.
     Faye Wang is an especially quirky delight, possessed of as strong and original a personality as that of Canadian Chinese actress Sandra Oh. Kaneshiro and Leung play such likable, attractive men we're left just as perplexed as they are as to why their lovers would ditch them. But Wong takes the larger view, musing on the capricious of fate and emotions--of connections more missed than made.

 

One country, two systems -

holding back Hong Kong

16 November 2002

"One country, two systems" remains a phrase created by the Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping largely to appease the British and to calm the people of Hong Kong. In 1997 the term seemed appropriate as Hong Kong set out upon one of the great experiments of the 21st century - capitalism under the world's biggest communist regime.

Five years on; this same concept holds back Hong Kong. The world's biggest communist regime is the world's biggest one party ruled capitalist regime. Even the Communist party is now embracing capitalists and entrepreneurs into its ranks.

Under the two systems concept Hong Kong was to enjoy the capitalist system and its way of life. Mainland China would stick to its socialist system. But Hong Kong has no democracy. No elected representation of the people. Worse still we are basically governed by big business taking care themselves; not by career politicians looking for the wealth and stability of the nation.

Economically, socially, culturally and politically Hong Kong is becoming more and more tightly bound by the grip of its new master. Economically its dependence upon China grows daily; socially, there are large-scale influxes of mainland immigrants and visitors. Culturally, its unique East-West character is steadily waning, becoming more like another Chinese city, just take a trip to Shatin town center if you doubt this. Politically, Hong Kong has moved further away from any semblance of a democratic society. Despite polls showing public support for Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa at only 30 percent he was still re-elected  unopposed to a second five-year term as the chief executive although not directly elected by the people but by a special electoral committee managed by China.

There is also the clear increase is self censorship by Hong Kong's previously unrestrained press as the consequence of infusions of Chinese capital into their operations.

At the time of its takeover, China promised that Hong Kong would be ruled by its own people and that its economic system would remain unchanged for a 50-year period. Five years on we are ruled from Beijing and substantially dependent on the mainland economy.

Cross border interaction dominates daily lives. Hong Kong's brightest and best look to China for work as the Hong Kong economy struggles. In 2001 Hong Kong's almost 7million residents made 117 million cross-border trips. Why do they go - for many it is simply that the cost of living across the border is so much lower. Simply put, Hong Kong's cost structure is too high relative to its productivity and its competition.

This week the government interfered, sorry passed legislation, to prop up property prices. This is not what Hong Kong needs. Lower property prices might upset home owners and the property developers but they also reduce costs encouraging investment and new business start ups.

Hong Kong's guaranteed 50 years of autonomy and self governance may be its very downfall. Hong Kong needs to be a part of a region attracting investment and tourism, a region managing the environment and a region that welcomes and nurtures talent.

Name one major world event that now take place in Hong Kong. The investment and leisure dollars are starting to bypass Hong Kong and move directly to China. Mission Hills announced last week that by 2004 their facility will have ten eighteen hole golf courses making it the largest golf facility in the world. Hong Kong cannot compete with investments of this scale; therefore we have to share in the prosperity that this can bring to the region.

We need more rapid integration that that proposed under one country two systems. It seems a nonsense that the existing border is the difference between an average annual salary of US$20,000 and an average annual salary of US$5,000. The two have to come together at a rate set by the market, not by the border.

There are great advantages in Hong Kong's lifestyle and its autonomy. Hong Kong residents pay no taxes to China. The civil service remains effective and clean. The ICAC goes after wrongdoing wherever it is found, in Hong Kong and mainland companies alike. The Falun Gong, banned on the mainland, remains legal here, albeit marginal. Organizations like the Center for Human Rights in China continue to operate here.

And above all a stable and transparent legal system with an independent judiciary perceived to be meting out justice fairly is the underlying guarantee of everything else. It is also a decisive competitive advantage for Hong Kong's economy. But ask any educated person across the bored and they would welcome an active anti corruption authority and a transparent legal system.

Over the last five years developments in China and the region have made clear the need for significant adaptation in the operation of the "one country, two systems" arrangement.

Improving cross border traffic flows, better co-ordinating infrastructure developments and tourism initiatives, is all a step in the right direction. Hong Kong people already look more positively towards China.

It is time to go further. One country, two systems says we are different and have different goals. Actually those goals are coming together very quickly. In should not take us two generations to reach full unification. This concept needs to be re-thought and new targets set. One example might come from the USA. The states still have significant authority over issues such as taxes and the judiciary; but their are no barriers to the movement of cash and human capital.

Can low cost airlines fly in Asia?

14 November 2002

The no-frills (or low cost) airlines are now well established in Europe and North America. Not just taking passengers away from the major airlines these new carriers have created new demand for air travel.

On a more limited scale the low cost model has come to Asia in the form of Air Asia, in Malaysia, and Virgin Blue, in Australia.

The big question is can this model operate on a wider scale in Asia.

The big answer is yes, but in time, and only with significant market liberalisation. The demand is certainly there. Air travel volume in Asia Pacific is forecast to triple by the year 2020.

To succeed low cost carriers need the following:

Airline requirements

Current status in Asia

 

 

Market liberalisation - open skies.

Asia remains heavily regulated, protecting "national" carriers. The flag carrier model is still strong and airlines such as Cathay, Singapore and Thai are profitable.

Domestic demand for point to point travel

Air Asia has shown that new markets for domestic travel can be found. In the USA Southwest's competition was less the airlines but more the bus and rail networks. Asia does not have the road or ferry or rail infrastructure. Affordable flying is the most efficient option.

The best low cost option in Asia is to build up a brand in a sizeable domestic market and then to opportunistically look at international routes as regulations allow.

International Demand for point to point travel

Held back by established bi-lateral agreements; the lack of affordable secondary airports, and the focus of the new airports on their role as international gateways. The demand is there. You would not want to drive from Kuala Lumpur to Bangkok or Hong Kong to Shanghai.

Flight lengths will be longer than those of US/European low costs carriers. International low cost carriers in Asia will not be able to offer the same frequency of scheduling as in Europe; overnight stopovers will be necessary; fuel costs are higher and low cost airlines can make no savings in this area. Airplane utilisation may be lower.

Low operating costs

Cathay Pacific will argue that they are waging a constant war on costs. The major Asian airlines are in a better position to adapt to new low cost entrants than the US and European airlines which continue to battle with entrenched unions and outdated work practices in every part of their companies.

Access to airport slots

Airport landing fees at major centers remain very high. There are few secondary airports in major centers.

Selling tickets online to customers

Air Asia sells 25% of its tickets online. That number will need to increase to eliminate call centre costs.

Access to planes

A buyers market for both new and second hand equipment.

Access to qualified pilots and technical support. Supportive unions.

Competition from the continued growth of the national carriers. Unions have a very limited role in most Asian economies.

 

China : The Aviation Market for the next 25 years

14 November 2002

The rate of growth of the aviation industry in China should not be underestimated. Distances are huge; road and rail infrastructure is limited. It is reasonable to assume that domestic air travel in China will resemble the US market within the next 25 years but on an even greater scale given the larger population base.

At the same time the aviation industry will support a rapid growth in both outbound and inbound business and leisure travel.

Consider some statistics:

In 2002 12 million mainland Chinese traveled overseas to "approved destinations".  The big markets are to Hong Kong and Macau; over 0.5 million tourists each year travel to Thailand and to Vietnam. Travel to Australia and New Zealand is expected to grow by 20% per annum.  A young, educated population with money to spend is now ready to explore the world beyond China.

By 2020 China will receive 130 million tourists a year making it the world's leading tourist destination.

Airbus and Boeing expect to sell 1,800 commercial airliners to China over he next 20 years.

From Hong Kong you can fly to at least 40 cities in China.

57 airlines from 47 countries (outside China and Hong Kong) fly to 20 destinations in China.

Hong Kong's population is 7 million

In the Pearl River Delta there are 300 million people.

In China there are about 100 airports supporting 1.3 billion people; compare this to 429 commercial airports supporting 280 million people in the USA and Canada.

In the US over 11 million jobs are related to the civil aviation industry. Imagine what this figure might be in China in 20 years time.

The dot-com bubble

13 November 2002

In a moment of nostalgia I was looking through a fairly recent collection of business cards: remember some of these great names:

asiacontent.com; bigonthenet.com; chinaweb.com; chinanet.com; chinaenternet.com; chinarem.com; enjoy100.com; ethnicearth.com; gorillasia.com; go2020.com; hunhun.com; icare.com; igolfallday.com; isteelasia.com; iamasia.com; myrice.com; nuuwz.com; ebusinessisbusiness.com; renren.com; sinobit.com; totalsportsasia.com; 2bsure.com

Some of these businesses may still exist; some will be extinct. But all were a tribute to entrepreneurism, hard work, greed, ambition, and simple market forces.

The internet boom and bust lasted just five or six years, arguably from 1996 to 2001; it might have been the most important business phenomenon of the last fifty years.

Asia perhaps arrived a little late into the boom period. Many of Asia's start ups were thin copies of US and European businesses. But it is also fair to say that some companies were responsible for true technological innovation and for very real changes in accepted business models. They also challenged established businesses to innovate and to embrace the internet more quickly than they otherwise might have done.

Three things Asia is not short of are cash, risk-takers and smart people. The dot-com companies were perfect for Asia. There was a creative and talented labour force, willing touts (sorry, investment bankers) to talk up the values, and willing investors looking for a winner; just like a day at the races !

Too many dot coms unfortunately did not have real products aimed at real customers. Established businesses had a customer base and in most cases knew how to look after them. They have outlived the dot coms.

The trouble is there were simply not enough good companies to go around.

But they were great days. People worked incredibly hard. People partied, talked and played.  Perhaps sanity has prevailed. But it is far less fun.

Leading in turbulent times

13 November 2002

When the dot com bubble burst thousands of companies were panicking. Staff were fired; perks were cut; travel budgets slashed; new products canceled.

What many companies ignored was the need to grow their revenue line while managing their costs. The best way to keep a company in good health is to get people to buy your products. You have to grow revenue to build value. Continually eroding costs simply removes value from an organisation.

How and where you cut costs is just as important as whether you cut costs. Poorly designed and executed cost reductions will cut value from a company; they reduce your long term competitiveness for short term cost savings.

In the cost cutting environment fear rules. Managers worry that they have or will fail and will lose their job. Employees worry that the cost cutter will get them next. These are emotional issues that many companies stop to address as they head into irrational panic.

What sort of leadership will succeed in these turbulent times? Some leaders see revenues slowing; they panic and start to slash and burn their costs. Some leader take no action at all, they are either paralyzed or clueless; they willfully ignore the data. Others accept the reality and evaluate their costs carefully seeking expenses that are not critical to the mission of the business and then start cutting.  This is the group most likely to succeed. Their approach is thoughtful but decisive. Their focus is to ensure that their business can still compete. They will communicate what they have to do and why; and for the most part, they will get the support of all of the company's stakeholders.

The evil weed

12 November 2002

I am never sure how anyone can justify managing or investing in the tobacco industry. Smoking kills. Smoking related disease costs global health services millions or billions each year.

The trouble is governments have neither the courage or the incentive to simply ban smoking. For a democracy such a decision would immediately alienate a large part of the electorate. It is hard to imagine how another party could capitalise on such a decision and still claim they were morally right; but capitalise on it they would, probably justified by some specious freedom of choice argument.

And then there is the tax revenue and duties. Without tobacco these tax revenues would have to be recovered elsewhere.

Around the world we have dubious alliances between western companies and military and unelected regimes. British American Tobacco owns the brands Dunhill, Rothmans and Lucky Strike. They have a factory in Myanmar which is a 60/40 joint venture with a company owned by that country's military government.

Myanmar is the name given to the country by the soldiers who have run it for four decades and which refused to allow the National League for Democracy to take its rightful place in government despite it winning 82% of the seats in free elections in 1990.

Kenneth Clarke, former Chancellor in Britain, wrote in a letter to his constituents that "The problem with Burma arises when companies start collaborating with an extremely unpleasant regime which is totally contrary to our notions of civil liberties and democracy."

Oops, Kenneth Clarke is a Director of BAT.

BAT's Company Chairman has stated that "Our goals are to continue creating long-term sustainable shareholder value, and to lead the tobacco industry in demonstrating corporate social responsibility and wider accountability."

BAT pays workers 23p a day at the Myanmar factory. The business is profitable for both its shareholders.

BAT's defence of its position in Myanmar is that the company employs 400 people. And that the best way forward is to continue to provide employment.

I could not be a BAT shareholder.

The royal victims of a circulation war

11 November 2002

Spare a thought for the two sons of the ill-fated marriage between Charles and Diana. Every morning they wake up to new and lurid revelations about the family that they have been born into. There must be times when they would happily swap privilege for a role amongst us commoners.

Talking of commoners the gutter press is now in full flow. Mr. Burrell took the Mirror's money. Mirror circulation is up some 300,000 a day so they will milk their prize for all it is worth. Meanwhile the Sun and its stable mate the News of the World, having had their higher offer turned down by Mr. Burrell, are showing the vengeance of a newspaper spurned.

Even the Herald Tribune is now reporting on three of the more damaging stories to emerge over the weekend - the "claims that the Prince of Wales hushed up the rape of a manservant (one George Smith) by one of his closest aides, that courtiers regularly brought male prostitutes into royal palaces, and that Paul Burrell ... had once taken a male lover of his own on a tour of the Queen's private apartment".


The Sun, that bastion of objectivity, went further.  Mr Smith also claims to have witnessed "an incident between a member of the [Royal] Family and a servant". He recorded the details on a videotape made by Princess Diana in 1996 and kept in the now famous locked wooden box which appears to be somewhere in the care of Mr.  Burrell. Now that should make for an interesting discussion over the Cornflakes in Buck House - who was it and what happened?

The Queen may be muttering about another annus horribilis - but in the circumstances that is probably not an appropriate expression !

A better question will soon be - should we care? The answer is an emphatic no. The monarchy's history is littered with scandals and sexual intrigue. The very stuff that sells newspapers. Just maybe the press and the royal family deserve each other. Abolish the family and the press has to find another victim.

(I hereby promise not to write another word about Mr. Burrell)

Week of  4 November 2002

Settling down

10 September 2002

I grew up (more than a few years ago) in what most people would regard as a very traditional British home. My parents had three children in rapid succession before either of them turned 30 years old. My mother ceased to work so that she could look after the children. I went to a good primary school. We had holidays in Wales (one in a caravan on the Gower Peninsular will never be forgotten !) and I learned to play the piano.

It must have been phenomenally hard work to bring up three kids that are so close in age as we all clammered for attention. It must have been hard financially. We rented out a room on the top floor of our house to help the costs. And we ate a lot of baked beans !

But my parents did well. They prospered and on the whole their children have done so as well.

But the values, way of life and experiences of their generation are already so out of date. In the course of one generation all of our thoughts on family life and responsibility have changed. It may be that the structure of family life has changed more in this generation than ever before in history.

I always thought of my father as an adult. But when I was born he was barely out of University. He went straight from being a teenager to being an adult. He took on adult responsibilities. Now we postpone these; now even the adult in us would rather be associated with youth. As our generation ages we aspire to all the things that we associate with young people. We want to be more multicultural, we want to embrace technology, we want to take risks, try new things, we want a younger looking body and will spend money to get it ! We mature later, if ever !

The very notion of settling down is changing. How can we be settled? We cannot maintain relationships. The average length of a British marriage is nine years; in the USA this is as little as seven. China is now seeing a rapidly increasing divorce rate. People marry later and they live longer.

Financial security is less certain. Many full time jobs have left the economy to be replaced by short term contracts and job insecurity.

We can form relationships later in life and children can be postponed until we are in our 30s and 40s.

Maybe a long term relationship or marriage has been regarded too much like a job. Something that is meant to be for a lifetime. What we might not all have seen is how quickly that job for life has become much more insecure. As in the workplace the relationships that people have are subject to huge stresses, new demands and regular change. In the workplace people increasingly expect to have a number of different careers. Maybe the new family structure is heading down that same path. And with so much uncertainty what can the next generation expect. Maybe the traditional family structure is not the answer for the future. Maybe we will evolve, and return, to more of a communal or tribal structure where the next generation grows up in a community of people who support each other and form more free flowing relationships among themselves. It would be a very different world.

The Long March to Capitalism

9 November 2002

In his long address to the 16th Party Congress of the Communist Party in Beijing President Jiang Zemin opened wide the party's doors to accept the monied and the elite as party members and leaders.

The party needs the support of private enterprise to retain its iron hand over  the country. At the same time private enterprise needs a stable government that will drive growth from within a stable environment. The two sides need eachother. Protection of income and protection of private property are watchwords for the new China. A far cry from the cultural revolution of less than forty years ago.

Conspicuous consumption is everywhere in the modern Chinese cities of the East Coast. People have money and have no qualms flaunting it.

But since unprecedented economic growth and improvements in living standards will fortify the position of the communist party in China no-one should expect any change in the political landscape. One party rule is here in China for a long time.

Some statistics from the Guardian newspaper are symptomatic of the new China:

Steel

China will account for more than a quarter of world's steel consumption in 2003

Cigarettes

About one-third of the world's smokers are Chinese, consuming 1,700 billion cigarettes a year

Cars

Sales of cars built in China increased 50% in the last nine months of 2002 to 843,853

Fast food

The largest McDonald's in the world opened in Bejing in 1992. There are more than 400 McDonald's in China

Tourism

More than 10 million Chinese go on holiday overseas each year according to the World Tourism Organisation, which expects the number to rise to 100 million by 2020

The other side

Almost 1.5m people in Shanghai are without running water and the World Bank estimates that 18.5% of the Chinese population live on less than $1 a day

Republican win opens the way for Bush's right wing agenda.

7 November 2002

With the results of the mid-term polls now collated President George W Bush now controls the US White House. the Senate and the House of Representatives. He can of course now also control the judiciary.

Make no mistake, the US swung well to the right  this week and there are no checks and balances to hold back a right wing agenda and a war against Iraq. George W Bush sees this weeks results as a referendum on his leadership. Forget compassionate conservatism. There will be little that is compassionate in this rejuvenated administration.

The only checks are not domestic. They are the US' European allies and the United Nations. The US/Europe relationship will be particularly interesting. Europe is predominantly more socialist in its leanings, less materialistic and less likely to accept government by the corporate enterprises that now dominate US politics.

Big business will be protected. The environment will not. And tax cuts will be legislated in time for the 2004 Presidential election much to the favour of the Republicans.

Expect the US political agenda to be dominated by gun lobbyists, military hawks, pre-emption apologists, anti-abortionists, tax cuts for the wealthy and corporates and hanging judges.

The Democratic opposition looks leaderless and agenda-less. President Bush could not be better placed for a second term. Six more years. Frightening.

Attack of the drones

7 November 2002

Not everyone will have picked up the significance of what happened in the Yemeni desert this week. An unmanned CIA drone fired a Hellfire missile into a car to execute six alleged terrorists.

I must have missed something: this is insane.

Executing six people in a foreign land is an act of war. No war has been declared. There are certain basic rules of sovereignty. These have been conveniently ignored.

No trial was held for the victims. There is no way to determine their guilt or innocence.

If the same six men had been in a car in Central in Hong Kong or Pall Mall in London would the CIA have carried out the same action?

Why is there no uproar at this action; why is there silence in the United Nations?

What we have here is pre-meditated murder carried out by a faceless executor. If you can get a drone close enough to fire a missile you can get a military team close enough to make an arrest.

We will never know whether these men were terrorists or otherwise. There are a lot of questions that should be asked, answers that should be demanded.

Misguided prejudice

5 November 2002

I am glad I am not James Tien, the chairman of Hong Kong's Liberal Party. I would not be able to sleep for embarrassment.

Yesterday he proposed that foreign domestic helpers in Hong Kong should be taxed HK$500 per month to help with the budget deficit.

The minimum wage in Hong Kong is HK$3,670. Many maids only make this amount despite six day weeks, responsibility for children and long hours.

Under the tax system in Hong Kong no tax is payable on earnings less than HK$9,000 a month. The Liberal parties proposal is rank prejudice.

Why the Hong Kong cricket sixes portend more bloodshed to come

5 November 2002

Living in Hong Kong are active, significant and vocal minorities from across Asia. There are lively Indian, Pakistani and Sri Lankan communities. Most of the European and North American nations are well represented as of course are the nations of East Asia.

The annual cricket 6s are an event where many of these nations come together for a celebration of fast food cricket. There is enough money and professional pride at stake to make it competitive. But for too many of the supporters it is a chance for flag waving and inane jingo-ism.

Last year the event was held less than two months after the 11 September attack. There were Pakistan supporters in the crowd calling for a holy war - a Jihad. It was not in fun. It was a hostile crowd. Now it may not have been no more than 50 people but it was enough to be intimidating. At that point I decided I would not attend this year.

The SCMP on its front page and on the letters page reports today that one idiot (and that is a polite term) wore an Osama bin Laden mask to the 6s on Sunday, and carried the Pakistan flag. He was allowed to walk to the west stand and to make obscene gestures in front of English and Australian supporters. Not surprisingly he was pelted with beer cans which then led to a group of Pakistanis charging the stand. Women and children were caught up in this. Officials and stewards stood and watched.

A number of Hong Kong residents lost family and friends in the recent Bali bombings. New York is still a painful memory for many. Stewards and security staff should have been sensitive to potential provocation and taken action. Bags were searched as people entered the ground. Food and drink were removed so that the in ground caterers could make their sales. By the time he was taunting the west stand it was too late to act.

What does it all mean?  Feelings run high. Osama bin Laden's supporters are spread globally. And it really is a simple question of what happens next and where. And it also means that the 6s will have even fewer westerners attending next year.

What did the butler see?

4 November 2002

What did Paul Burrell know?  We will now have to wait for his carefully sanitised memoirs. Had he given evidence in court under oath we may have learned much more about her family's secrets.

And that is at the heart of the Queen's calculated actions last week. She was not saving the loyal servant. After all she had been happy to let him stew for almost two years. She was protecting the family. Motivated self interest.

The only way to be sure to silence Mr. Burrell was to release details of their confidential conversation. A conversation which lasted three hours. Prince Charles apparently is lucky to get a few minutes. Tony Blair maybe an hour at best. And it took her 22 months to recall the conversation with Mr. Burrell.

The loyal servant had said nothing. He was protecting the families secrets and the contents of wooden box kept by the late Princess of Wales that contained letters and other items that could severely embarrass the royal family likely including further revelations about the future King and his unusual looking girlfriend.

She stopped the trial because she knew there were revelations to come. The Windsors have known all along that Mr. Burrell was trying to keep their tawdry secrets. And they were not planning to do a thing about it. Only when it looked as though he might be forced to give evidence under oath did they act.

A frank and full statement from Buckingham Palace would be as appropriate as it is unlikely. Paying Mr. Burrell's legal costs would also be appropriate.

Week of  28 October 2002

Upstairs Downstairs - a very British fetish

3 November 2002

It was on 18 January 2001 when the police searched the Cheshire home of Paul Burrell, butler to the late Princess of Wales and arrested him on suspicion of theft.

The police leaked (how convenient) details of what they found including personal letters and photographs; the clear implication was that Burrell had removed items that he could subsequently sell at considerable value.

On 3 August 2001 the police visited Prince Charles and his son Prince William to explain the details of their charges. Their vivid imaginations painted a horrifying picture of the once trusted butler.

In January 2002 the Crown Prosecution Service sought to take the case to trial. But an Old Bailey judge agreed that the trial would be a distraction from the events of the Queen's Golden Jubilee celebrations; so the trial of an innocent man was delayed until the autumn.

As the trial started the Queen was in Canada (where they clearly do not have newspapers or regular contact with events back in the UK.) On returning to England she had to attend a memorial service for the Bali bomb victims in St Pauls.

We are led to believe that as she and Charles sat in the car they discussed the Burrell case and the Queen suddenly recovered from her amnesia and remembered a 1997 meeting with Burrell where he had told the Queen that he was holding some of the late Princess' belongings for safe keeping.

The Queen is reported to be an intelligent woman; she apparently reads newspapers and watches the news. How could she have been unaware of the importance of the information that she had. How could she, her advisors and courtiers have so willingly allowed Paul Burrell and his family to endure 22 months of great distress. Maybe she should be charged with obstructing justice?

Charles advised his staff to notify the police and the prosecution case was blown open; albeit by hearsay evidence without a witness statement.

What is the result of this farce: serious embarrassment to the police, the Crown Prosecution Service, the royal family and the judicial system. Incidentally the trial cost about gbp 1.5 million.

Let us hope Mr. Burrell gets the apology from all parties that is due to him; let us hope the police take appropriate action to reprimand the social climbers, and fantasists in their number.

For the Queen this will be the crowning memory of her Golden Jubilee year; overshadowed by a Princess who has been dead for 5 years. She and her family look callous, out of touch, and frankly, redundant.

 

The Observer newspaper took a serious look at the legal aspects of this case; and asked the following rather relevant questions:

Sunday November 3, 2002
The Observer


A leading judge suggests ten questions that Parliament should ask the Attorney General:

1 Why did a simple case of theft occupy the most important court at the Old Bailey when much more important cases, such as David Shayler's, went to other courts?

2 Why was reliance placed on inadmissible hearsay evidence (what the Queen told Charles and he then told the police) when the police should have obtained a witness statement from the Queen?

3 When potentially important evidence emerges before or during a criminal trial, the proper practice is for the prosecution to take a normal witness statement under a procedure which threatens the witness with two years' imprisonment for any falsehood. Why was this not followed in the case of the potential witness, Elizabeth Windsor?

4 Invariably, a witness statement is served on the defence and the witness is brought to court to testify if the defence wishes to challenge the evidence. Why was this not done?

5 Why is the Director of Public Prosecutions' office pretending that it's t