|
Period
from 23 December 2002
Nestle - do they
know its Christmas?
24 December
2002
In 1984,
appalled by film of the famine in Ethiopia, Sir Bob Geldorf wrote
Do they Know its Christmas; he cajoled, encouraged and persuaded
the hit list of British 1980s pop to perform the song; and all
proceeds went to acquire and ship food and medical supplies to
Ethiopia.
The song was
released in November of 1984, and immediately debuted at Number One in
Great Britain, and was Number One on the American charts two weeks
later. The song sold fifty million copies worldwide. Midge Ure was the
co-producer, and he personally accompanied the first relief shipment
of over $70,000 worth of food and medical supplies to Ethiopia, in
March 11, 1985.
Now 18 years on
the lessons have not been learned.
The
multinational coffee, cereal and confectionery company, Nestle, is
demanding US$ 6 million from the Ethiopian government.
Ethiopia is
fighting its worst famine for 20 years. It is the poorest country in
the world. The average annual income is US$ 100. One in every ten new
born children will not see their first birthday. The government has
acknowledged its legal liability but argues that it simply cannot
afford the repayment but has offered US$ 1.5 million to settle the
claim.
The background
is slightly complicated. In 1975 the then military government in
Ethiopia nationalised the Ethiopian Livestock Development Company,
which at that time was owned in part by a German company, the
Schweisfurth Group. Schwiesfurth was acquired by Nestle in 1986. It is
a fair bet that the recoverability of an 11 year old debt was a
discount to the purchase price. If it was not then the due diligence
was negligent.
Oxfam state that
US$ 6 million would feed over one million people for a month. The
Ethiopian prime minister believes that 6 million of his people already
need emergency food aid. That number increase daily.
There has been a
three year drought. Crops have failed. And ironically, the price of
coffee has collapsed. Coffee production supports one quater of
Ethiopia's population. Nestle is the worlds largest coffee producer.
Oh yes, Nestle's
2001 profits were US$ 5.5 billion.
Under intense
public pressure Nestle is now talking about investing the repayment
back into Ethiopia. But it is not yet talking about waiving the debt.
The assets in
Ethiopia were nationalised 25 years ago. Nestle did not even own the
company at the time. The company is trying to make cash out of a debt
that it surely wrote of many years ago.
Nestle's
employees and shareholders must be hugely embarrassed. A quick climb
down, an apology and a contribution of US$ 6 million to famine relief
in Ethiopia would win Nestle many friends. Until then I strongly
suggest that you boycott their products.
You can also
write to the company using the following link.
http://www.maketradefair.com/spage/english/action14.asp?subcat=1&cat=1&select=1&special=yes
The lyrics to
Do They Know Its Christmas:
1: It's Christmas time
There's no need to be afraid
At Christmas time
We let in light and we banish shade
And in our world of plenty
We can spread a smile of joy
Throw your arms around the world
At Christmas time
2: But say a prayer
Pray for the other ones
At Christmas time it's hard
But when you're having fun
There's a world outside your window
And it's a world of dread and fear
Where the only water flowing
Is the bitter sting of tears
And the Christmas bells that ring
There are the clanging chimes of doom
Well tonight thank God it's them instead of you
Feed the world
Let them know it's Christmas time
Feed the world
Do they know it's Christmas time at all?
3: And there won't be snow in Africa
This Christmas time
The greatest gift they'll get this year is life
Where nothing ever grows
No rain nor rivers flow
Do they know it's Christmas time at all?
Feed the world
Let them know it's Christmas time
Feed the world
Let them know it's Christmas time again
BRIDGE:
(Here's to you) raise a glass for everyone
(Here's to them) underneath that burning sun
Do they know it's Christmas time at all?
END: Feed the world
Let them know it's Christmas time |
Useful
Links for this story:
A list of Nestle
Products:
http://www.nestle.co.uk/about/brands/
Oxfam:
http://www.oxfam.org/eng/
Right sizing Christmas
Sadly
this is not an rascott.com original - it is far too funny to be from
me !
Twelve Days of Christmas Memo
CORPORATE MEMO
To: All Staff
Date: December 1
Subject: New "Twelve Days of Christmas" Policy
The recent announcement that Donner and Blitzen have elected to take
the early reindeer retirement package has triggered a good deal of
concern about whether they will be replaced, and about other
restructuring decisions at the North Pole.
Streamlining is due to the North
Pole's loss of dominance in the season's gift distribution business.
Home Shopping TV channels and mail order catalogues have diminished
Santa's market share. He and the Board could not sit idly by and
permit further erosion of the profit picture.
The reindeer downsizing was made
possible through purchase of a late model Japanese sled for the CEO's
annual trip. Improved productivity from Dasher and Dancer, who
summered at the Harvard Business School, is anticipated. Reduction in
the reindeer will also lessen airborne environmental emissions for
which the North Pole has received unfavorable press (gas and solid
waste).
We're pleased to inform you that
Rudolph's role will not be disturbed. Tradition still counts for
something at the North Pole!
Management denies, in the strongest
possible language, the earlier leak that Rudolph's nose gets red, not
from the cold, but from substance abuse. Calling Rudolph "a lush who
was into the sauce and never did pull his share of the load" was an
unfortunate comment, made by one of Santa's helpers and taken out of
context at a time of the year when they are known to be under
'executive stress'.
As for further restructuring,
today's global challenges require the North Pole to continue to look
for better, more competitive steps. Effective immediately, the
following economy measures are to take place in the "Twelve Days of
Christmas" music subsidiary:
1) The partridge will be retained,
but the pear tree, which never produced the cash crop forecasted, will
be replaced by a plastic hanging plant, providing considerable savings
in maintenance;
2) Two turtle doves represent a
redundancy that is simply not cost effective. In addition, their
romance during working hours could not be condoned. The positions are,
therefore, eliminated;
3) The three French hens will remain
intact. After all, everyone loves the French;
4) The four calling birds will be
replaced by an automated voice mail system, with a call waiting
option. An analysis is underway to determine who the birds have been
calling, how often and how long they talked;
5) The five golden rings have been
put on hold by the Board of Directors. Maintaining a portfolio based
on one commodity could have negative implications for institutional
investors. Diversification into other precious metals, as well as a
mix of T-Bills and high technology stocks, appear to be in order;
6) The six geese-a-laying
constitutes a luxury which can no longer be afforded. It has long been
felt that the production rate of one egg per goose per day was an
example of the general decline in productivity. Three geese will be
let go, and an upgrading in the selection procedure by personnel will
assure management that, from now on, every goose it gets will be a
good one;
7) The seven swans-a-swimming is
obviously a number chosen in better times. The function is primarily
decorative. Mechanical swans are on order. The current swans will be
retrained to learn some new strokes, thereby enhancing their
outplacement;
8) As you know, the eight
maids-a-milking concept has been under heavy scrutiny by the EEOC. A
male/female balance in the workforce is being sought. The more
militant maids consider this a dead-end job with no upward mobility.
Automation of the process may permit the maids to try a-mending,
a-mentoring or a-mulching;
9) Nine ladies dancing has always
been an odd number. This function will be phased out as these
individuals grow older and can no longer do the steps;
10) Ten Lords-a-leaping is overkill.
The high cost of Lords, plus the expense of international air travel,
prompted the Compensation Committee to suggest replacing this group
with ten out-of-work congressmen. While leaping ability may be
somewhat sacrificed, the savings are significant as we expect an
oversupply of unemployed congressmen this year;
11) Eleven pipers piping and twelve
drummers drumming is a simple case of the band getting too big. A
substitution with a string quartet, a cutback on new music, and no
uniforms, will produce savings which will drop right to the bottom
line;
Overall we can expect a substantial
reduction in assorted people, fowl, animals and related expenses.
Though incomplete, studies indicate that stretching deliveries over
twelve days is inefficient. If we can drop ship in one day, service
levels will be improved.

Regarding the lawsuit filed by the
attorney's association seeking expansion to include the legal
profession ("thirteen lawyers-a-suing"), a decision is pending.
Deeper cuts may be necessary in the
future to remain competitive. Should that happen, the Board will
request management to scrutinize the Snow White Division to see if
seven dwarfs is the right number.
Happy Holidays !
Period from 2
December 2002
Cheriegate -
never lie to the media !
14 December
2002
How Cherie Blair must
regret being introduced to Peter Foster, the convicted fraudster who
helped her purchase two apartments in Bristol, in the South West of
England.
While no one has
suggested that anything illegal took place it is the judgment of Ms
Blair, and by association the Prime Minister, that has come under
focus.
The underlying concern,
and expect this to figure prominently in Mr. Foster's revelations, is
that in return for his help, Ms Blair interceded on Foster's behalf in
his extradition hearings from the UK, possibly using the influence of
No 10 Downing Street,
When the government's
press office initially denied Foster's involvement they lied. And
there is nothing more damaging than lying to the very resourceful
British media. They are like sharks; they smell a weakness and attack.
Leaked e-mails confirmed Foster's involvement and the saga has
continued from there.
He has now sold his story
to a frenzied media and new revelations are inevitable.
Downing street has come
to a halt for two weeks. Iraq, Firemen strikes and other events of
import, have been relegated to also-rans while Tony Blair and his
advisors go full tilt into damage limitation mode ! Ms Blair's tearful
and rather theatrical apologies were hopefully genuine rather than
misleading the British public further.
Many of us continue to
wish Blair's government well. The alternatives are too frightening to
consider. There are elements of the British Press that abhor the very
idea of Labour rule - even of new Labour rule. The Mail on Sunday and
The Scotsman have both been at the forefront of the
mud-slinging.
The trouble is that
Downing Street, the Prime Minister and his wife failed
to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth from the
outset. The public are still not convinced that the truth his now
being told. The government's credibility has been weakened.
The Guardian, a
newspaper that harbours much goodwill for the government wrote
yesterday that,
"Cheriegate is
not just about Mrs Blair, her role and judgment. It is also, in a
resonant way, about New Labour as a whole. The affair is a catalyst
for a wider reflection on the tone and dignity of the government, its
leaders, its methods and perhaps even its moral compass."
What the Blairs
need to do now is avoid a siege mentality; they need to be public and
accountable. They are not being hounded by politicians in the way Bill
Clinton was. They are being hounded by parts of the media. The best
that they can do is use that media to win back public confidence and
support.
The short lived return of Henry
Kissinger
14 December 2002
Daniel Patrick
Moynihan in A Dangerous Place, his book about the United
Nations, said of Henry Kissinger: ''Henry does not lie because it is
in his interest to lie. He lies because it is in his nature to lie.''
Kissinger' track
record includes the Vietnam war, the secret bombing of Cambodia and
the overthrow of the Chilean president Salvador Allende and his
replacement with General Agusto Pinochet.
So why on earth
did George Bush appoint a man with a legendary reputation for
deception to head the so-called independent commission to study the
World Trade Center disaster? Did he expect that Kissinger will add
credibility to the report? Or rather, did he hope that Kissinger will
cover up what needs to be covered up?
These questions may be
less relevant given that Kissinger has resigned as head of the
commission citing conflicts of interest with his consulting business.
That in itself is worrying since it is widely believed that his
consulting clients include Saudi rulers; and the Saudi links to the
September 11th attack on the US have never been fully investigated.
One guarantee;
the findings of the commission can now be delayed until after the 2004
elections.
Kissinger
remains dogged by allegations of war crimes. These are documented at
this site. He
is also (remarkably) a winner of the Nobel peace prize, as documented
here.
Iraq's
weapons report rejected by the USA
14 December
2002
Hijacked by the
US government on its arrival at the United Nations this 12,000 page
document could have been 12,000 blank pages given the predictability
of the US reaction.
The Bush
administration has already dismissed Iraq's weapons declaration as
woefully short of facts. "We know that Iraq has weapons of mass
destruction and has programs to create more," the State Department
said.
There is an
inevitability about war with Iraq. It is not will there be a war as
when will there be a war. Saddam's 12,000 page report has been
described as the longest suicide note in history. US intelligence says
Saddam is lying. The UN inspectors will be allowed to run around for a
while. Eventually the UN inspectors will be given access to US
intelligence. And they will find something that is sufficient for the
UN to acquiesce while the US and Britain attack.
The only way to
disarm Saddam is to depose him and by extension to kill (or capture)
him.
The US
government clearly links the war on Iraq (WI) to the war on terrorism
(WT). In Washington they consider it is just a matter of time before
the next terrorist attack takes place in their country. The
connections between al-Qaida and Saddam are clearly tenuous, but to
the US they are very real. The US is the world's only superpower. It
is a role that frankly the country is too immature and too self
centered for them to carry such a burden of responsibility.
Helping the
W***** in the Black.
14 December
2002
It is widely
known that football referees enjoy low digit IQs. Why else would they
do a job that pays so badly and where they endure endless abuse.
And in many
cases that abuse is deserved. The favourite chants from the terrace of
"who is the w***** in the black" are testament to the affection we all
have for football referees.
Now if the
referees are bad; the linesmen are disgraceful. This evening
Manchester United were leading beleaguered West Ham United 2-0 just
before half time. West Ham look to have scored; a goal that might
change their fortune and the direction of the game. The linesman flags
for offside; he is looking at the middle of the pitch where the action
is; he is not looking five yards in front of him where O'Shea, the
United defender, is playing Defoe onside by about three yards. It was
a shocking decision. But it is also a decision that could have been
over ruled by video evidence within seconds. The goal should have been
allowed.
The technology
is there; use it. At the highest level, the players and their fans
deserve the best decision making. A fourth official looking at
television monitors is a must for premier, european and international
football. It is a travesty that it is not already in use.
Week of
25 November 2002
Thoughts on the Hong Kong Open
Golf Championship
29 November 2002
Sport or pastime?
I spent yesterday at the first round
of the Omega sponsored Hong Kong Open golf tournament.
The big question is can golf be
called a sport?
I used to think of a sport as being
defined by whether someone could go further, faster, higher than their
opponent; or score more than their opponent. It is that element of
competition that defines a sport.
But can a sport be something that
you can do when smoking? And so many golfers puff their way around a
golf course! I wonder whether a pro golfer can elect to play in a
smoking or non smoking group.
Hong Kong's event woes
The open golf is being held at the
Hong Kong Golf Club (no longer royal!) in Fanling. It is an old
parkland course. And it is not in the best of condition. The course
had to be radically changed this year after some of the greens became
diseased. So we are left with a short par 69 course that has far too
many short par 4s which the pros play as a fairway wood and a short
iron. It is a test of target golf not suited to the big hitters.
And the remaining greens are still
poor. They are not championship standard. Hong Kong can clearly host
an event. The trouble is it does not have world class, or even top
class, facilities.
Why golf is so dull to watch
Watching golf is like walking around
a library; you are surrounded by people going "shush" at you all the
time. I swear the caddies would stop the birds from singing if they
could. And the marshals can hear a whisper at 100 yards.
Why not change the game completely.
Encourage shouting and chanting. Make it like a football match and
there may be a few people turning up. I must have been almost the only
paying visitor yesterday. The other five people and a dog who were
there (the weather was not good) all had guest passes, players guest
passes, press passes or members passes.
Can you imagine the referee trying
to silence a 60,000 crowd at Old Trafford as a penalty is taken. It
requires the same concentration as a three foot putt. So lets have
some noise and some fun on the golf course...choruses of "there is
only one Jose-Maria...."
Good value from the big names
The one piece of good news was
seeing Messrs Faldo and Olazabal running a golf clinic for local kids
some 5 hours after they had both finished their morning rounds. The
kids loved it and the players looked relaxed. Now I assume they are
both on appearance money from the sponsors and the clinic was part of
the package; but it was good to see.
Its a cool yule in the land of
political correctness
26 November 2002
My regular reader will know that I
am fond of most things Canadian. Toronto is a wonderfully
multicultural city; its residents come form all over the world and
they speak over 100 different languages.
But there are times when the
politically correct, and emotionally naive, make the city of Toronto
and the country look very sad and dull indeed.
Toronto city officials last week decided to
call the 50-foot tree set up outside City Hall a "holiday tree." The
mayor was forced to intervene amidst the general scorn.
"Our special events staff went too far with
their political correctness when they called it a holiday tree," said
Mayor Mel Lastman. "They were trying to be inclusive and their hearts
were in the right place, but you can't be politically correct all the
time."
The name change led to complaints from
Christians and left many non-Christians wondering what all the fuss
was
about. The most sensible words
came from Anita Bromberg of the Jewish group B'nai Brith Canada who
said "to take a generic term, slap it on a symbol that really only has
significance to one religion...and then say we're being multicultural
does not really fit...whatever you call it, it's still a Christmas
tree."
And its not just the city of Toronto; The
Royal Canadian Mint has a commercial in which it changes the old
holiday standard "Twelve Days of Christmas" to "Twelve Days of
Giving."
This sense of righteousness is so
unnecessary. Accepting people for what they are and where they are
from and then enjoying their holidays and festivities is what makes
for a vibrant society. The politically correct have no joy, no sense
of fun, and will bring us all down to the lowest common denominator.
The sad reality of Saudi Arabia
25 November 2002
The US have allowed the Saudi
government to play for both sides for far too long. The US have sought
Saudi assistance in a future war with Iraq. Yet at the same time the
US has tolerated the Saudi's complicity with anti-Western
fundamentalists.
Simply to hold onto their authority
the Saudi ruling party have provided shelter for terrorist activity.
Now, and this is no great surprise, there is increasing evidence that
the Saudis have been funding terrorism. Fifteen of the 19 hijackers of
11 September were from Saudi Arabia; 125 inmates at Camp X-ray, which
holds the al-Qaeda suspects at Guantanamo Bay, are from Saudi Arabia.
Saudi leaders "have to decide which side
they're on," Senator Joe Leiberman said on CBS' Face the
Nation. "For too many generations they have pacified and
accommodated themselves to the most extreme, fanatical, violent
elements of Islam, and those elements have now turned on us and the
rest of the world."
Leiberman is a sensible and moderate
democrat. He has been leading an independent commission investigating
the attack on the US.
Why has the US tolerated the Saudi regime.
Saudi sits on 3/4 of the world's oil reserves. There is no better
reason.
Cultural Naivety
25 November 2002
We are all too naive. It is time to listen to
the wake up call. The gulf between cultures is, post September 11,
2001, wider than it has ever been. And we move further away from
understanding and tolerance to distrust and enmity. On both sides the
call is now a call to arms, it is not a call to peaceful exchange and
goodwill.
Two simple examples. A culture where a woman
can be stoned to death for adultery clearly contains elements that
will not be enthused by a parade of female flesh or the "modernity" it
promises. To hold the Miss World Contest during Ramadan compounded the
insult.
This is the same cultural naivety exposed by
the bombing of the Sari club in Bali. One clubber mourned the passing
of the club on a website, saying "it was the United Nations of
decadence" without any sense that this is what made it a target.
It is not acceptable for the west to assume
that its values are paramount and that its values can be exported
anywhere in the world. The usual western apology is is that because no
harm is meant, no offence should be taken.
We may well be in a new era of Muslim
fundamentalism. Bin Laden is alive and well. His call to arms to
British Muslims in a letter published over the weekend in Britain has
put that country on its highest level of alert. Suspicion and mistrust
and commonplace. In the face of such threats freedom and the truth are
the first casualties.
There has been a western arrogance that
assumes that western interests and values are self evidently
desirable. It is time for greater sensitivity. Tolerance, equality and
democracy are true values. Western pop culture, beauty pageants,
corporate big business, are best left at home.
Week of
18 November 2002
The Miss World fiasco - time to
end this anachronism
24 November 2002
It never made any sense for the Miss
World contest to be held in Nigeria. What has happened is that the
Miss World pageant has fanned the flames of communal hatred and left
more than 200 people dead. The organisers can deny it all they like;
but their event was the catalyst.
It was of course that country's
right to be the host as it is the home of the reigning Miss World. But
it made no sense to hold a beauty contest in the middle of the holy
month of Ramadan in a country that is tearing itself apart between the
Sharia law of the Muslims and the nation's other faiths and its
constitution. What were the organisers thinking ?
The Sharia law has been established
in 12 of Nigeria's 31 states, all in the impoverished north of the
country.
The government insists that the
Sharia law is illegal; the government is ignored and the Sharia law is
extended not just to the Muslim populations in these states but to
Nigeria's christians and other indigenous faiths.
The death penalty is meant to be
confirmed throughout the country by the Federal Court. But the Sharia
courts regularly impose the ultimate penalty and death sentences have
been carried out without recourse to the federal court and without
federal government intervention.
Meanwhile a woman, Amina Lawal has
been sentenced to death by stoning for having had a baby outside
marriage; the sentence to be carried out when she has weaned her
daughter. Her appeal to a higher Sharia court has been dismissed.
The Sharia courts routinely sentence
prisoners to amputation of limbs and flogging. Yet such punishments
are in direct defiance of the Nigerian constitution, which forbids
'cruel and inhuman punishment'.
And then the Miss World contestants
arrive. Some refused to go to Nigeria because of the Lawal case. This
in itself brought about an increase in (adverse) publicity to the
event in the north.
On 17th November the ThisDay
newspaper ran an article in support of the pageant and pouring scorn
on Muslim criticism of the event.
Despite three front page apologies
the Muslim population of Kaduna rioted; ThisDay's offices were
torched; the newspaper editor has been arrested and the spreading
riots have taken some 200 lives and displaced thousands from their
homes.
The beauty queens have now left for
London; the event has no UK sponsor and no television support. Lets
hope it now goes away for ever.
Meanwhile back in Nigeria just maybe
the events of the last week will focus the country's 120 million
people on a more peaceful future.
The US calls for a white paper
for article 23 in Hong Kong - how ironic !
23 November 2002
The US state department issued a
statement yesterday calling for the SAR government in Hong Kong to
issue a white paper for public consultation with the exact wording of
the proposed Article 23 legislation.
The fact that the US government has
made this statement indicates just how serious the issue of Article 23
is.
It also indicates that the SAR
government has to date done a poor job of "selling" the proposed
legislation and answering the genuine questions and concerns of
interested parties.
The USA certainly has a right to be
an interested party. Many US citizens are resident in Hong Kong. The
article 23 proposals may impact on their personal freedoms.
The trouble is that this is simply
not the right time for the USA to be preaching to the rest of the
world on the subject of individual freedoms ! This is the country that
assassinated alleged terrorists in Yemen without trial. A country
deeply fearful of attacks on their homeland, deeply suspicious of
foreigners (except Tony Blair, Mr. Bush's favourite poodle), A country
that in its fear is embracing the harsh policies of the ultra right
wing and a country where Donald Rumsfeld can command a near bottomless
budget.
Domestic criticism of the US
government is almost non existent. If you are not with us you are
against us is the message.
The US State Department may just
need to check what is happening in their own country before they start
to tell the SAR government what to do !
Webstats for rascott.com
23 November 2002
I am occasionally asked if anyone
actually looks at this website.
Well, someone must do; and more
would always be welcome. On 13th November there were 684 hits on the
site; not all me, I promise. The highest number of unique visits was
41 on November 11th. For November there are on average 20 visits a day
and 216 hits.
These may not be huge numbers but
out of small acorns grow great oak trees.....
Thank you to all of you who do log
onto this site and check out my latest ranting ! Do come back soon -
and tell your friends !
Continuing Thai scandals will
wear down investors
22 November 2002
Thailand is a wonderful country. Its
people are talented and resilient. It deserves a government that can
live up to its pre-election promises and deal head on with the rising
tide of corruption.
Today's Bangkok Post is very
revealing. The three leading stories on the front page stories
include:
B27 million (say US$650,000) a year
creamed from highway toll revenues, the latest on the lamyai (a fruit)
mortgage scandals, collusion in a state firm to inflate a property's
purchase price.
Another recent scam include flood
victims being given fake compost for use on their farms.
The trouble with each of these
conspiracies is that they appear to involve politicians, civil
servants and business people acting in unison. And the credibility of
the government for its citizens and for foreign investors starts to
look very shakey.
There is a National Counter
Corruption Commission (not unlike the ICAC in Hong Kong). This
Commission needs the support of the Prime Minister and his cabinet. It
needs to be visibly seen to be working and to be working quickly and
effectively.
Week of
11 November 2002
"Chungking Express" - a timeless
tale of surviving life in the big city !
17 November 2002
Sight & Sound
Magazine (the monthly
magazine of the British Film Institute)
asked fifty leading UK film critics for
their best films from the past 25 years.
In this survey published last week, Chungking Express directed by Wong
Kar-Wai came in at number eight, the highest placing of any Asian
film.
Released in 1994 this was one of the
first Hong Kong films that I saw after coming here and it was the
start of my very one sided love affair with Faye Wong.
The simple summary
of the film is that there are two stories, two lovelorn cops, two
objects of desire: one a big-time heroin dealer in deep trouble with
her bosses after the cargo disappears (Brigette Lin), the other a
seriously flaky bartender (Faye Wong) who inadvertently gets hold of
the keys to Officer 663's (Tony Leung) apartment. The movie is shot in
a breathless kaleidoscope of colour and hand-held camerawork to create
a mesmerising portrait of Hong Kong in the 1990s.
The following review
is from the Los Angeles Times (8 March 1996). If you have not seen
this film, and you have any interest in Hong Kong, then read this
review and rush out to find a copy of the movie.
'Express' Takes Stylish Look at Love
By KEVIN THOMAS, TIMES STAFF WRITER
Wong Kar-Wai's "Chungking
Express" is as fresh as falling rain, a pair of love stories
full of pain and humor. Shot fast and sometimes furiously on
crowded Hong Kong streets, it speaks in its own highly personal
shorthand, expressed through the most fluid of cameras and
punctuated with bold whooshes of color and potent bursts of
American pop music.
While so much of the Hong Kong cinema we get to see is
either period fantasy or modern action-thriller in the martial
arts genre, "Chungking Express" ravishingly, seductively exudes
the immediacy of everyday life as its spins its classically
timeless tales of love lost and almost regained. Wong has the
kind of utterly unpredictable style that brings to mind two
other distinctive filmmakers, Quentin Tarantino (who is
presenting this film) and Jim Jarmusch.
A handsome, sweet-natured young policeman (Takeshi
Kaneshiro), known only as Badge No. 223, tells us that he has
come within "0.01 meter" of a mysterious woman (Brigitte Lin)
wearing sunglasses, trench coat and a blond wig and will fall in
love with her 57 hours later. While he is nursing his pain at
the loss of his lover, who left him exactly one month before,
the blond is rushing around Chungking Mansions, a huge maze-like
tenement/bazaar in the claustrophobic tourist heart of Hong
Kong. She's setting up a drug-smuggling deal with some Indian
merchants only to have them double-cross her with the bravura of
a magician's vanishing act, endangering her life. By the time
she and No. 223 cross paths at a bar, she's prepared only to
drink herself into oblivion.
As "Chungking House," as Part I is called, comes to its
deft conclusion, No. 223 introduces us to another woman, Faye
(Faye Wang), with whom he also comes within "0.01 meter." Faye
has just taken a job at the Midnight Express--that's also the
title of Part II--a snack bar in the trendy Lan Kwei Fong
district frequented not only by No. 223 but another cop, No. 633
(Tony Leung), who has just received a Dear John from his
beloved. (This is the boyish Tony Leung, not to be confused with
the taller, sleeker actor of the same name best known for "The
Lover.")
Gawky, very young, uncertain of what to do with her life
but determined to find out, Faye, who has a Jean Seberg
"Breathless"-style haircut, grows concerned about the despondent
police officer. She has started falling in love with him but is
too unsure of herself to say so. Instead, she sneaks into his
apartment, subtly rearranging it in an attempt to cheer him up
(but which makes him think he must be losing his mind for sure).
You strongly suspect that Wong must have suffered his own
romantic loss to feel the need to express it through not only
one but two men, whom he gives funny quirks. No. 223 has a thing
for canned pineapple, discovering he wants to buy only cans with
a May 1 expiration date, which is also his 25th birthday, the
age when people start becoming aware of their mortality. Beyond
May 1 is too painful to contemplate for No. 223, too indicative
that his lover has definitively left him, too suggestive that
everything in life may have an expiration date. Similarly, No.
663 finds himself pouring his heart out to inanimate objects in
his tiny apartment.
Wong has as wonderful a way with actors as he has with a
camera--certainly, his virtuoso cinematographer Christopher
Doyle deserves a deep bow here, as does his clutch of
mood-establishing composers.
Faye Wang is an especially quirky delight, possessed of as
strong and original a personality as that of Canadian Chinese
actress Sandra Oh. Kaneshiro and Leung play such likable,
attractive men we're left just as perplexed as they are as to
why their lovers would ditch them. But Wong takes the larger
view, musing on the capricious of fate and emotions--of
connections more missed than made.
|
One country, two systems -
holding back Hong Kong
16 November 2002
"One country, two systems" remains a
phrase created by the Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping largely to appease
the British and to calm the people of Hong Kong. In 1997 the term
seemed appropriate as Hong Kong set out upon one of the great
experiments of the 21st century - capitalism under the world's biggest
communist regime.
Five years on; this same concept
holds back Hong Kong. The world's biggest communist regime is the
world's biggest one party ruled capitalist regime. Even the Communist
party is now embracing capitalists and entrepreneurs into its ranks.
Under the two systems concept Hong
Kong was to enjoy the capitalist system and its way of life. Mainland
China would stick to its socialist system. But Hong Kong has no
democracy. No elected representation of the people. Worse still we are
basically governed by big business taking care themselves; not by
career politicians looking for the wealth and stability of the nation.
Economically, socially, culturally
and politically Hong Kong is becoming more and more tightly bound by
the grip of its new master. Economically its dependence upon China
grows daily; socially, there are large-scale influxes of mainland
immigrants and visitors. Culturally, its unique East-West character is
steadily waning, becoming more like another Chinese city, just take a
trip to Shatin town center if you doubt this. Politically, Hong Kong
has moved further away from any semblance of a democratic society.
Despite polls showing public support for Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa
at only 30 percent he was still re-elected unopposed to a second
five-year term as the chief executive although not directly elected by
the people but by a special electoral committee managed by China.
There is also the clear increase is
self censorship by Hong Kong's previously unrestrained press as the
consequence of infusions of Chinese capital into their operations.
At the time of its takeover, China
promised that Hong Kong would be ruled by its own people and that its
economic system would remain unchanged for a 50-year period. Five
years on we are ruled from Beijing and substantially dependent on the
mainland economy.
Cross border interaction dominates
daily lives. Hong Kong's brightest and best look to China for work as
the Hong Kong economy struggles. In 2001 Hong Kong's almost 7million
residents made 117 million cross-border trips. Why do they go - for
many it is simply that the cost of living across the border is so much
lower. Simply put, Hong Kong's cost structure is too high relative to
its productivity and its competition.
This week the government interfered,
sorry passed legislation, to prop up property prices. This is not what
Hong Kong needs. Lower property prices might upset home owners and the
property developers but they also reduce costs encouraging investment
and new business start ups.
Hong Kong's guaranteed 50 years of
autonomy and self governance may be its very downfall. Hong Kong needs
to be a part of a region attracting investment and tourism, a region
managing the environment and a region that welcomes and nurtures
talent.
Name one major world event that now
take place in Hong Kong. The investment and leisure dollars are
starting to bypass Hong Kong and move directly to China. Mission Hills
announced last week that by 2004 their facility will have ten eighteen
hole golf courses making it the largest golf facility in the world.
Hong Kong cannot compete with investments of this scale; therefore we
have to share in the prosperity that this can bring to the region.
We need more rapid integration that
that proposed under one country two systems. It seems a nonsense that
the existing border is the difference between an average annual salary
of US$20,000 and an average annual salary of US$5,000. The two have to
come together at a rate set by the market, not by the border.
There are great advantages in Hong
Kong's lifestyle and its autonomy. Hong Kong residents pay no taxes to
China. The civil service remains effective and clean. The ICAC goes
after wrongdoing wherever it is found, in Hong Kong and mainland
companies alike. The Falun Gong, banned on the mainland, remains legal
here, albeit marginal. Organizations like the Center for Human Rights
in China continue to operate here.
And above all a stable and
transparent legal system with an independent judiciary perceived to be
meting out justice fairly is the underlying guarantee of everything
else. It is also a decisive competitive advantage for Hong Kong's
economy. But ask any educated person across the bored and they would
welcome an active anti corruption authority and a transparent legal
system.
Over the last five years
developments in China and the region have made clear the need for
significant adaptation in the operation of the "one country, two
systems" arrangement.
Improving cross border traffic
flows, better co-ordinating infrastructure developments and tourism
initiatives, is all a step in the right direction. Hong Kong people
already look more positively towards China.
It is time to go further. One
country, two systems says we are different and have different goals.
Actually those goals are coming together very quickly. In should not
take us two generations to reach full unification. This concept needs
to be re-thought and new targets set. One example might come from the
USA. The states still have significant authority over issues such as
taxes and the judiciary; but their are no barriers to the movement of
cash and human capital.
Can low cost airlines fly in
Asia?
14 November 2002
The no-frills (or low cost) airlines
are now well established in Europe and North America. Not just taking
passengers away from the major airlines these new carriers have
created new demand for air travel.
On a more limited scale the low cost
model has come to Asia in the form of Air Asia, in Malaysia, and
Virgin Blue, in Australia.
The big question is can this model
operate on a wider scale in Asia.
The big answer is yes, but in time,
and only with significant market liberalisation. The demand is
certainly there. Air travel volume in Asia Pacific is forecast to
triple by the year 2020.
To succeed low cost carriers need
the following:
|
Airline requirements |
Current status in Asia |
|
|
|
|
Market liberalisation - open skies. |
Asia remains heavily regulated,
protecting "national" carriers. The flag carrier model is still
strong and airlines such as Cathay, Singapore and Thai are
profitable. |
|
Domestic demand for point to point
travel |
Air Asia has shown that new markets
for domestic travel can be found. In the USA Southwest's
competition was less the airlines but more the bus and rail
networks. Asia does not have the road or ferry or rail
infrastructure. Affordable flying is the most efficient option.
The best low cost option in Asia is
to build up a brand in a sizeable domestic market and then to
opportunistically look at international routes as regulations
allow. |
|
International Demand for point to
point travel |
Held back by established bi-lateral
agreements; the lack of affordable secondary airports, and the
focus of the new airports on their role as international gateways.
The demand is there. You would not want to drive from Kuala Lumpur
to Bangkok or Hong Kong to Shanghai.
Flight lengths will be longer than
those of US/European low costs carriers. International low cost
carriers in Asia will not be able to offer the same frequency of
scheduling as in Europe; overnight stopovers will be necessary;
fuel costs are higher and low cost airlines can make no savings in
this area. Airplane utilisation may be lower. |
|
Low operating costs |
Cathay Pacific will argue that they
are waging a constant war on costs. The major Asian airlines are
in a better position to adapt to new low cost entrants than the US
and European airlines which continue to battle with entrenched
unions and outdated work practices in every part of their
companies. |
|
Access to airport slots |
Airport landing fees at major
centers remain very high. There are few secondary airports in
major centers. |
|
Selling tickets online to customers |
Air Asia sells 25% of its tickets
online. That number will need to increase to eliminate call centre
costs. |
|
Access to planes |
A buyers market for both new and
second hand equipment. |
|
Access to qualified pilots and
technical support. Supportive unions. |
Competition from the continued
growth of the national carriers. Unions have a very limited role
in most Asian economies. |
China : The Aviation Market for
the next 25 years
14 November 2002
The rate of growth of the aviation
industry in China should not be underestimated. Distances are huge;
road and rail infrastructure is limited. It is reasonable to assume
that domestic air travel in China will resemble the US market within
the next 25 years but on an even greater scale given the larger
population base.
At the same time the aviation
industry will support a rapid growth in both outbound and inbound
business and leisure travel.
Consider some statistics:
In 2002 12 million mainland Chinese
traveled overseas to "approved destinations". The big markets
are to Hong Kong and Macau; over 0.5 million tourists each year travel
to Thailand and to Vietnam. Travel to Australia and New Zealand is
expected to grow by 20% per annum. A young, educated population
with money to spend is now ready to explore the world beyond China.
By 2020 China will receive 130
million tourists a year making it the world's leading tourist
destination.
Airbus and Boeing expect to sell
1,800 commercial airliners to China over he next 20 years.
From Hong Kong you can fly to at
least 40 cities in China.
57 airlines from 47 countries
(outside China and Hong Kong) fly to 20 destinations in China.
Hong Kong's population is 7 million
In the Pearl River Delta there are
300 million people.
In China there are about 100
airports supporting 1.3 billion people; compare this to 429 commercial
airports supporting 280 million people in the USA and Canada.
In the US over 11 million jobs are
related to the civil aviation industry. Imagine what this figure might
be in China in 20 years time.
The dot-com bubble
13 November 2002
In a moment of nostalgia I was
looking through a fairly recent collection of business cards: remember
some of these great names:
asiacontent.com; bigonthenet.com;
chinaweb.com; chinanet.com; chinaenternet.com; chinarem.com;
enjoy100.com; ethnicearth.com; gorillasia.com; go2020.com; hunhun.com;
icare.com; igolfallday.com; isteelasia.com; iamasia.com; myrice.com;
nuuwz.com; ebusinessisbusiness.com; renren.com; sinobit.com;
totalsportsasia.com; 2bsure.com
Some of these businesses may still
exist; some will be extinct. But all were a tribute to entrepreneurism,
hard work, greed, ambition, and simple market forces.
The internet boom and bust lasted
just five or six years, arguably from 1996 to 2001; it might have been
the most important business phenomenon of the last fifty years.
Asia perhaps arrived a little late
into the boom period. Many of Asia's start ups were thin copies of US
and European businesses. But it is also fair to say that some
companies were responsible for true technological innovation and for
very real changes in accepted business models. They also challenged
established businesses to innovate and to embrace the internet more
quickly than they otherwise might have done.
Three things Asia is not short of
are cash, risk-takers and smart people. The dot-com companies were
perfect for Asia. There was a creative and talented labour force,
willing touts (sorry, investment bankers) to talk up the values, and
willing investors looking for a winner; just like a day at the races !
Too many dot coms unfortunately did
not have real products aimed at real customers. Established businesses
had a customer base and in most cases knew how to look after them.
They have outlived the dot coms.
The trouble is there were simply not
enough good companies to go around.
But they were great days. People
worked incredibly hard. People partied, talked and played.
Perhaps sanity has prevailed. But it is far less fun.
Leading in turbulent times
13 November 2002
When the dot com bubble burst
thousands of companies were panicking. Staff were fired; perks were
cut; travel budgets slashed; new products canceled.
What many companies ignored was the
need to grow their revenue line while managing their costs. The best
way to keep a company in good health is to get people to buy your
products. You have to grow revenue to build value. Continually eroding
costs simply removes value from an organisation.
How and where you cut costs is just
as important as whether you cut costs. Poorly designed and executed
cost reductions will cut value from a company; they reduce your long
term competitiveness for short term cost savings.
In the cost cutting environment fear
rules. Managers worry that they have or will fail and will lose their
job. Employees worry that the cost cutter will get them next. These
are emotional issues that many companies stop to address as they head
into irrational panic.
What sort of leadership will succeed
in these turbulent times? Some leaders see revenues slowing; they
panic and start to slash and burn their costs. Some leader take no
action at all, they are either paralyzed or clueless; they willfully
ignore the data. Others accept the reality and evaluate their costs
carefully seeking expenses that are not critical to the mission of the
business and then start cutting. This is the group most likely
to succeed. Their approach is thoughtful but decisive. Their focus is
to ensure that their business can still compete. They will communicate
what they have to do and why; and for the most part, they will get the
support of all of the company's stakeholders.
The evil weed
12 November 2002
I am never sure how anyone can
justify managing or investing in the tobacco industry. Smoking kills.
Smoking related disease costs global health services millions or
billions each year.
The trouble is governments have
neither the courage or the incentive to simply ban smoking. For a
democracy such a decision would immediately alienate a large part of
the electorate. It is hard to imagine how another party could
capitalise on such a decision and still claim they were morally right;
but capitalise on it they would, probably justified by some specious
freedom of choice argument.
And then there is the tax revenue
and duties. Without tobacco these tax revenues would have to be
recovered elsewhere.
Around the world we have dubious
alliances between western companies and military and unelected
regimes. British American Tobacco owns the brands Dunhill, Rothmans
and Lucky Strike. They have a factory in Myanmar which is a 60/40
joint venture with a company owned by that country's military
government.
Myanmar is the name given to the
country by the soldiers who have run it for four decades and which
refused to allow the National League for Democracy to take its
rightful place in government despite it winning 82% of the seats in
free elections in 1990.
Kenneth Clarke, former Chancellor in
Britain, wrote in a letter to his constituents that "The problem with
Burma arises when companies start collaborating with an extremely
unpleasant regime which is totally contrary to our notions of civil
liberties and democracy."
Oops, Kenneth Clarke is a Director
of BAT.
BAT's Company Chairman has stated that "Our
goals are to continue creating long-term sustainable shareholder
value, and to lead the tobacco industry in demonstrating corporate
social responsibility and wider accountability."
BAT pays workers 23p a day at the Myanmar
factory. The business is profitable for both its shareholders.
BAT's defence of its position in Myanmar is
that the company employs 400 people. And that the best way forward is
to continue to provide employment.
I could not be a BAT shareholder.
The royal victims of a
circulation war
11 November 2002
Spare a thought for the two sons of
the ill-fated marriage between Charles and Diana. Every morning they
wake up to new and lurid revelations about the family that they have
been born into. There must be times when they would happily swap
privilege for a role amongst us commoners.
Talking of commoners the gutter
press is now in full flow. Mr. Burrell took the Mirror's money.
Mirror circulation is up some 300,000 a day so they will milk
their prize for all it is worth. Meanwhile the Sun and its stable mate
the News of the World, having had their higher offer turned
down by Mr. Burrell, are showing the vengeance of a newspaper spurned.
Even the Herald Tribune is
now reporting
on three of the more damaging stories to emerge over the weekend - the
"claims that the Prince of Wales hushed up the rape of a manservant
(one George Smith) by one of his closest aides, that courtiers
regularly brought male prostitutes into royal palaces, and that Paul
Burrell ... had once taken a male lover of his own on a tour of the
Queen's private apartment".
The Sun, that
bastion of objectivity, went further. Mr Smith also claims to
have witnessed "an incident between a member of the [Royal] Family and
a servant". He recorded the details on a videotape made by Princess
Diana in 1996 and kept in the now famous locked wooden box which
appears to be somewhere in the care of Mr. Burrell. Now that
should make for an interesting discussion over the Cornflakes in Buck
House - who was it and what happened?
The Queen may be muttering about
another annus horribilis - but in the circumstances that is
probably not an appropriate expression !
A better question will soon be -
should we care? The answer is an emphatic no. The monarchy's history
is littered with scandals and sexual intrigue. The very stuff that
sells newspapers. Just maybe the press and the royal family deserve
each other. Abolish the family and the press has to find another
victim.
(I hereby promise not to write
another word about Mr. Burrell)
Week of
4 November 2002
Settling down
10 September 2002
I grew up (more than a few years
ago) in what most people would regard as a very traditional British
home. My parents had three children in rapid succession before either
of them turned 30 years old. My mother ceased to work so that she
could look after the children. I went to a good primary school. We had
holidays in Wales (one in a caravan on the Gower Peninsular will never
be forgotten !) and I learned to play the piano.
It must have been phenomenally hard
work to bring up three kids that are so close in age as we all
clammered for attention. It must have been hard financially. We rented
out a room on the top floor of our house to help the costs. And we ate
a lot of baked beans !
But my parents did well. They
prospered and on the whole their children have done so as well.
But the values, way of life and
experiences of their generation are already so out of date. In the
course of one generation all of our thoughts on family life and
responsibility have changed. It may be that the structure of family
life has changed more in this generation than ever before in history.
I always thought of my father as an
adult. But when I was born he was barely out of University. He went
straight from being a teenager to being an adult. He took on adult
responsibilities. Now we postpone these; now even the adult in us
would rather be associated with youth. As our generation ages we
aspire to all the things that we associate with young people. We want
to be more multicultural, we want to embrace technology, we want to
take risks, try new things, we want a younger looking body and will
spend money to get it ! We mature later, if ever !
The very notion of settling down is
changing. How can we be settled? We cannot maintain relationships. The
average length of a British marriage is nine years; in the USA this is
as little as seven. China is now seeing a rapidly increasing divorce
rate. People marry later and they live longer.
Financial security is less certain.
Many full time jobs have left the economy to be replaced by short term
contracts and job insecurity.
We can form relationships later in
life and children can be postponed until we are in our 30s and 40s.
Maybe a long term relationship or
marriage has been regarded too much like a job. Something that is
meant to be for a lifetime. What we might not all have seen is how
quickly that job for life has become much more insecure. As in the
workplace the relationships that people have are subject to huge
stresses, new demands and regular change. In the workplace people
increasingly expect to have a number of different careers. Maybe the
new family structure is heading down that same path. And with so much
uncertainty what can the next generation expect. Maybe the traditional
family structure is not the answer for the future. Maybe we will
evolve, and return, to more of a communal or tribal structure where
the next generation grows up in a community of people who support each
other and form more free flowing relationships among themselves. It
would be a very different world.
The Long March to Capitalism
9 November 2002
In his long address to the 16th
Party Congress of the Communist Party in Beijing President Jiang Zemin
opened wide the party's doors to accept the monied and the elite as
party members and leaders.
The party needs the support of
private enterprise to retain its iron hand over the country. At
the same time private enterprise needs a stable government that will
drive growth from within a stable environment. The two sides need
eachother. Protection of income and protection of private property are
watchwords for the new China. A far cry from the cultural revolution
of less than forty years ago.
Conspicuous consumption is
everywhere in the modern Chinese cities of the East Coast. People have
money and have no qualms flaunting it.
But since unprecedented economic
growth and improvements in living standards will fortify the position
of the communist party in China no-one should expect any change in the
political landscape. One party rule is here in China for a long time.
Some statistics from the Guardian
newspaper are symptomatic of the new China:
Steel
China will account for more than a quarter of
world's steel consumption in 2003
Cigarettes
About one-third of the world's smokers are
Chinese, consuming 1,700 billion cigarettes a year
Cars
Sales of cars built in China increased 50% in
the last nine months of 2002 to 843,853
Fast food
The largest McDonald's in the world opened in
Bejing in 1992. There are more than 400 McDonald's in China
Tourism
More than 10 million Chinese go on holiday
overseas each year according to the World Tourism Organisation, which
expects the number to rise to 100 million by 2020
The other side
Almost 1.5m people in Shanghai are without
running water and the World Bank estimates that 18.5% of the Chinese
population live on less than $1 a day
Republican win opens the way for
Bush's right wing agenda.
7 November 2002
With the results of the mid-term
polls now collated President George W Bush now controls the US White
House. the Senate and the House of Representatives. He can of course
now also control the judiciary.
Make no mistake, the US swung well
to the right this week and there are no checks and balances to
hold back a right wing agenda and a war against Iraq. George W Bush
sees this weeks results as a referendum on his leadership. Forget
compassionate conservatism. There will be little that is compassionate
in this rejuvenated administration.
The only checks are not domestic.
They are the US' European allies and the United Nations. The US/Europe
relationship will be particularly interesting. Europe is predominantly
more socialist in its leanings, less materialistic and less likely to
accept government by the corporate enterprises that now dominate US
politics.
Big business will be protected. The
environment will not. And tax cuts will be legislated in time for the
2004 Presidential election much to the favour of the Republicans.
Expect the US political agenda to be
dominated by gun lobbyists, military hawks, pre-emption apologists,
anti-abortionists, tax cuts for the wealthy and corporates and hanging
judges.
The Democratic opposition looks
leaderless and agenda-less. President Bush could not be better placed
for a second term. Six more years. Frightening.
Attack of the drones
7 November 2002
Not everyone will have picked up the
significance of what happened in the Yemeni desert this week. An
unmanned CIA drone fired a Hellfire missile into a car to execute six
alleged terrorists.
I must have missed something: this
is insane.
Executing six people in a foreign
land is an act of war. No war has been declared. There are certain
basic rules of sovereignty. These have been conveniently ignored.
No trial was held for the victims.
There is no way to determine their guilt or innocence.
If the same six men had been in a
car in Central in Hong Kong or Pall Mall in London would the CIA have
carried out the same action?
Why is there no uproar at this
action; why is there silence in the United Nations?
What we have here is pre-meditated
murder carried out by a faceless executor. If you can get a drone
close enough to fire a missile you can get a military team close
enough to make an arrest.
We will never know whether these men
were terrorists or otherwise. There are a lot of questions that should
be asked, answers that should be demanded.
Misguided prejudice
5 November 2002
I am glad I am not
James Tien, the chairman of Hong Kong's Liberal Party. I would not be
able to sleep for embarrassment.
Yesterday he proposed
that foreign domestic helpers in Hong Kong should be taxed HK$500 per
month to help with the budget deficit.
The minimum wage in
Hong Kong is HK$3,670. Many maids only make this amount despite six
day weeks, responsibility for children and long hours.
Under the tax system in
Hong Kong no tax is payable on earnings less than HK$9,000 a month.
The Liberal parties proposal is rank prejudice.
Why the Hong Kong
cricket sixes portend more bloodshed to come
5 November 2002
Living in Hong Kong are
active, significant and vocal minorities from across Asia. There are
lively Indian, Pakistani and Sri Lankan communities. Most of the
European and North American nations are well represented as of course
are the nations of East Asia.
The annual cricket 6s
are an event where many of these nations come together for a
celebration of fast food cricket. There is enough money and
professional pride at stake to make it competitive. But for too many
of the supporters it is a chance for flag waving and inane jingo-ism.
Last year the event was
held less than two months after the 11 September attack. There were
Pakistan supporters in the crowd calling for a holy war - a Jihad. It
was not in fun. It was a hostile crowd. Now it may not have been no
more than 50 people but it was enough to be intimidating. At that
point I decided I would not attend this year.
The SCMP on its front
page and on the letters page reports today that one idiot (and that is
a polite term) wore an Osama bin Laden mask to the 6s on Sunday, and
carried the Pakistan flag. He was allowed to walk to the west stand
and to make obscene gestures in front of English and Australian
supporters. Not surprisingly he was pelted with beer cans which then
led to a group of Pakistanis charging the stand. Women and children
were caught up in this. Officials and stewards stood and watched.
A number of Hong Kong
residents lost family and friends in the recent Bali bombings. New
York is still a painful memory for many. Stewards and security staff
should have been sensitive to potential provocation and taken action.
Bags were searched as people entered the ground. Food and drink were
removed so that the in ground caterers could make their sales. By the
time he was taunting the west stand it was too late to act.
What does it all mean?
Feelings run high. Osama bin Laden's supporters are spread globally.
And it really is a simple question of what happens next and where. And
it also means that the 6s will have even fewer westerners attending
next year.
What did the butler see?
4 November 2002
What did Paul Burrell know? We
will now have to wait for his carefully sanitised memoirs. Had he
given evidence in court under oath we may have learned much more about
her family's secrets.
And that is at the heart of the
Queen's calculated actions last week. She was not saving the loyal
servant. After all she had been happy to let him stew for almost two
years. She was protecting the family. Motivated self interest.
The only way to be sure to silence
Mr. Burrell was to release details of their confidential conversation.
A conversation which lasted three hours. Prince Charles apparently is
lucky to get a few minutes. Tony Blair maybe an hour at best. And it
took her 22 months to recall the conversation with Mr. Burrell.
The loyal servant had said nothing.
He was protecting the families secrets and the contents of wooden box
kept by the late Princess of Wales that contained letters and other
items that could severely embarrass the royal family likely including
further revelations about the future King and his unusual looking
girlfriend.
She stopped the trial because she
knew there were revelations to come. The Windsors have known all along
that Mr. Burrell was trying to keep their tawdry secrets. And they
were not planning to do a thing about it. Only when it looked as
though he might be forced to give evidence under oath did they act.
A frank and full statement from
Buckingham Palace would be as appropriate as it is unlikely. Paying
Mr. Burrell's legal costs would also be appropriate.
Week of
28 October 2002
Upstairs Downstairs - a very
British fetish
3 November 2002
It was on 18 January 2001 when the
police searched the Cheshire home of Paul Burrell, butler to the late
Princess of Wales and arrested him on suspicion of theft.
The police leaked (how convenient)
details of what they found including personal letters and photographs;
the clear implication was that Burrell had removed items that he could
subsequently sell at considerable value.
On 3 August 2001 the police visited
Prince Charles and his son Prince William to explain the details of
their charges. Their vivid imaginations painted a horrifying picture
of the once trusted butler.
In January 2002 the Crown
Prosecution Service sought to take the case to trial. But an Old
Bailey judge agreed that the trial would be a distraction from the
events of the Queen's Golden Jubilee celebrations; so the trial of an
innocent man was delayed until the autumn.
As the trial started the Queen was
in Canada (where they clearly do not have newspapers or regular
contact with events back in the UK.) On returning to England she had
to attend a memorial service for the Bali bomb victims in St Pauls.
We are led to believe that as she
and Charles sat in the car they discussed the Burrell case and the
Queen suddenly recovered from her amnesia and remembered a 1997
meeting with Burrell where he had told the Queen that he was holding
some of the late Princess' belongings for safe keeping.
The Queen is reported to be an
intelligent woman; she apparently reads newspapers and watches the
news. How could she have been unaware of the importance of the
information that she had. How could she, her advisors and courtiers
have so willingly allowed Paul Burrell and his family to endure 22
months of great distress. Maybe she should be charged with obstructing
justice?
Charles advised his staff to notify
the police and the prosecution case was blown open; albeit by hearsay
evidence without a witness statement.
What is the result of this farce:
serious embarrassment to the police, the Crown Prosecution Service,
the royal family and the judicial system. Incidentally the trial cost
about gbp 1.5 million.
Let us hope Mr. Burrell gets the
apology from all parties that is due to him; let us hope the police
take appropriate action to reprimand the social climbers, and
fantasists in their number.
For the Queen this will be the
crowning memory of her Golden Jubilee year; overshadowed by a Princess
who has been dead for 5 years. She and her family look callous, out of
touch, and frankly, redundant.
The Observer newspaper took a
serious look at the legal aspects of this case; and asked the
following rather relevant questions:
|
Sunday November 3, 2002
The Observer
A leading judge suggests ten questions that Parliament should
ask the Attorney General:
1 Why did a simple case of theft
occupy the most important court at the Old Bailey when much more
important cases, such as David Shayler's, went to other courts?
2 Why was reliance placed on
inadmissible hearsay evidence (what the Queen told Charles and he
then told the police) when the police should have obtained a
witness statement from the Queen?
3 When potentially important
evidence emerges before or during a criminal trial, the proper
practice is for the prosecution to take a normal witness statement
under a procedure which threatens the witness with two years'
imprisonment for any falsehood. Why was this not followed in the
case of the potential witness, Elizabeth Windsor?
4 Invariably, a witness statement
is served on the defence and the witness is brought to court to
testify if the defence wishes to challenge the evidence. Why was
this not done?
5 Why is the Director of Public
Prosecutions' office pretending that it's t | |