The perils of a foreign land
30
November 2007
Today in Sudan an
English teacher languishes in prison. Why? Because she allowed the primary
school students in her class in Khartoum to call a teddy bear Mohamed, the
revered name of the Prophet.
In a hasty trial
she was sentenced yesterday to 15 days in prison followed by deportation for
insulting religion and inciting hatred.
The British media
in particular reports this case as further evidence of the barbarism
inherent in a fundamentalist interpretation of Islam. In Sudan it has played
out as further proof of a concerted campaign to denigrate Islam.
Of course it is
nothing of the sort. Ms Gillian Gibbons is an innocent abroad caught up in a
political drama that uses religion as an excuse.
But her case does
show just how exposed we all can be living in foreign lands where one simple
act can change our lives and how naive or innocent actions that are
acceptable is one lands can bring frightening repercussions in others. Ms
Gibbons was bringing education to the nation's children. She would never
have thought that the naming of a bear would land her in court where
potentially she was facing jail, 40 lashes in public and deportation.
Ms Gibbons was a teacher at Unity High School, a school run by Christians
that follows a British-style curriculum. It is a prominent reminder of
Sudan's colonial past, a tempting target to a government seeking political
gain.
Ms Gibbons has
become caught up in the ugly politics of Sudan. This case distracts
attention from the Sudanese government's ugly role in the Darfur conflict
and deteriorating relations with the south of the country.
Ms Gibbons was
arrested after police received a complaint from the school secretary that
the teacher insulted the Prophet Mohamed by allowing her students to give a
teddy bear his name. In September, the pupils had been allowed to vote on a
name for the stuffed toy and rejected Ms Gibbons' suggestion of "Faris",
meaning horseman, in favour of "Mohamed" – also the name of one of the most
popular boys in her class.
Each weekend, one
pupil was allowed to take the bear home and detail its " activities" in a
diary which bore a picture of the teddy on the cover next to the words "My
Name is Mohamed".
The row could have
been defused by quiet diplomacy, but instead incendiary literature was
circulated in Khartoum and mass demonstrations were organised.
This was not some
spontaneous outpouring by outraged believers. The semi-official Assembly of
Ulemas, consisting of clerics and scholars, had already made up its
collective mind that “what has happened was not haphazard or carried out
from ignorance”. Such statements are the calculated response of the Sudan
regime.
Meanwhile in
Darfur there have been four years of fighting between insurgents and
government-backed militias; perhaps as many as 300,000 lives have been lost,
with 2.2 million left homeless. Khartoum has been accused of genocide. So
the government positions itself as the defender of Islam and dismisses
criticism as unwarranted interference from the anti-Islamic West.
The Sudanese
regime has made its point and the Khartoum courts will release and deport
Mrs Gibbons after 15 days ending this salutary tale of political and
religious paranoia.
Ms Gibbons was and
innocent lost abroad caught up in events far beyond her classroom.
Court to rule on BKK night flights
29
November 2007
The Administrative
Court in Bangkok is expected to rule within days on demands to suspend night
flights at Suvarnabhumi airport by people living in its vicinity.
Somchai Armin, who
represents the 359 residents bringing the noise-abatement case, said the
flights could be moved to Don Mueang airport.
This is highly
unlikely to succeed.
His clients have
asked the court to bar domestic and international flights at Suvarnabhumi
from 10pm to 5am so they can get a proper night's sleep.
Mr Somchai said
yesterday's hearing focused on the impact the ban would have on the country
and measures to alleviate the residents' plight. He expected a decision
within a few days.
The residents
brought a case in the court on Nov 21 against Airports of Thailand (AoT),
the Civil Aviation Department chief, the transport minister, the Pollution
Control Department chief and the natural resources and environment minister.
AoT
representatives rejected the demand, saying it would cause losses of two
billion baht a day and possible lawsuits from air carriers demanding
compensation for breach of contract.
Mr Somchai, who is
a member of the Lawyers Council of Thailand's environmental committee, said
night flights could be shifted to Don Mueang.
The AoT said it
was not possible as flights were scheduled in advance. However, it was
possible that flights which caused excessive noise could be limited to the
daytime.
Bahrain Air to launch in January
24
November 2007
The Gulf skies
will get a little more crowded as Bahrain's second national carrier Bahrain
Air will start operations on January 17. The low-cost airline, which will
also offer business class, will use a modern Airbus A320 fleet - with 12
seats in business and 150 in economy. It will initially fly on Bahrain,
Dubai, Mashad, Beirut and Alexandria routes.
The airline plans
to increase the number of destinations to 25 in the next three years. There
are expected to be 14 destinations by April 2008, 23, including the
Indian subcontinent, by 2009 and to 25 by 2010.
This will add to
he pressure on the ailing national carrier, Gulf Air.
Will Labour win down under?
24
November 2007
It is
a fascinating election campaign. The Australians economically are sound;
Australia is prosperous. Economic growth has been churning along for more
than a decade, largely fueled by funneling resources into the mighty engine
of China. Unemployment is at a generational low of barely 4% and getting
lower. So the usual epithet of it it isn't broke don't fix it should apply.
But
Australians also appear to be tired of 11 years of rule by John Howard's
Liberal (read Conservative) coalition. The issues are more about Australia's
moral responsibilities; issues of global warming, and participation in Iraq
are at the fore.
Voting is compulsory in Australia (they should try that in the USA). The
polls are now closed and the Labour Party is claiming a win.
Exit
polls appear to favour a Labour win but can people really embrace the
unknown and evict a government that has managed their prosperity.
The
Sydney Morning Herald pulls no punches - "A clear majority remain heartily
sick of the Prime Minister and his Coalition claque of tired mediocrities."
Meanwhile the Age in Melbourne states that "ONLY the return of the Coalition
Government will guarantee that the Australian economy remains in safe hands.
A strong economy enables governments to deliver better deals in education,
health, the environment and infrastructure."
Rudd
made climate change the issue for his Labour Party and Howard was left
behind. There may be a lesson here for the next US election; is climate
change is definite vote winner with younger voters? The Labour Party in
Australia is both aware of it and says it has a coherent policy to address
it.
As
well as facing a significant Labour majority Mr Howard looks very likely to
lose his Sydney based constituency. If he does he will become only the
second sitting prime minister in Australia’s 106-year history of federal
government to lose his seat.
As
for Mr. Rudd: he is widely considered a nerdy technocrat, lofty intellectual
and all-round know it all. Caught eating his earwax in a parliamentary
debate suddenly made him more human and approachable. Search for this on
Youtube;it is funny !
Rudd then came to national prominence as Labour's foreign affairs spokesman
before winning the leadership last December, ending years of disarray in the
party.
In
character he is similar to Howard; being regarded as bland enough to avoid
polarising voters too much. Both are family men, committed Christians and
economic conservatives. Mr Howard barely drinks; Mr Rudd says he has been
drunk just twice in his life.
"Kevin Rudd is basically John Howard without the nasty bits," said Peter
Hartcher, political editor of the Sydney Morning Herald.
Labour's promises include scrapping the controversial industrial relations
reforms, providing a free computer for every high school student and
generous tax breaks.
On
foreign policy, Mr Rudd has promised to withdraw Australia's 550 combat
troops from Iraq and sign the Kyoto Protocol on global warming. He would
maintain Australian forces in Afghanistan and might even expand their
deployment.
Relations with Britain are likely to remain largely unchanged. The key
relationship will be with China. Rudd, a fluent Mandarin speaker was a
diplomat in Beijing and there are billions of dollars of trade between the
two nations.
In
an tiring election campaign of television, internet and baby kissing Rudd
has by all accounts appeared slick, almost presidential. An Australian Tony
Blair in the early days before he got dragged into Iraq.
Long serving governments get lazy and jaded and out of touch. It probably is
time for a change.
RAK Air ready to take off
23
November 2007
RAK Airways
announced yesterday it will take to the skies on November 29 with its
inaugural flight to Beirut.
The UAE’s fourth national carrier also announced the launch of flights to
Colombo, Sofia and Dhaka, and is set to unveil further destinations in
India, Nepal, Qatar and Tanzania, within the next three months.
The airline will
start with one Boeing-757 and will add two more aircraft, either Boeing
737-800s or Airbus A320s before the end of the year.
There are plans to expand the fleet to have 10 aircraft by
2010, covering about 20 destinations within the Gulf, South Asia, Middle
East and East Africa. The airline plans to undertake transcontinental
flights over the next two to three years.
The airline expects to carry around one million passengers a year,
projecting growth of 20% over the next two to three years.
Dubai built it and the world did come
From The Financial Times - 22 November 2007
An
interesting commentary on the growth of, and life in, Dubai from John Gapper
in the Financial Times:
"My epiphany about
the Gulf state of Dubai came one night last week in the Souk Madinat
Jumeirah. I was standing in the local franchise of Trader Vic’s, the
Californian Hawaiian-themed bar, with a Mai Tai cocktail in hand, watching
people dance to a salsa band.
I was with a bunch
of visitors and locals, some of them consultants at McKinsey & Co, which has
a large office in Dubai, as have many European and US banks and legal firms.
One of the group was from Spain, another from Venezuela and a third from
South Africa. Rounding it out were Americans whose parents were variously
born in Jordan, Pakistan and Taiwan.
It felt as if I
had died and gone to expatriate heaven.
There are many
jaw-dropping things about the flashiest city-state of the United Arab
Emirates: the rows of office and hotel towers decorated in marble and gold
leaf; the miles of coastal salt-flats reclaimed into sandy beaches; the vast
desert area where the Universal City Dubailand theme park will go; the new
airport that will supposedly be bigger than Heathrow and LAX combined.
But the true
astonishment is that the Dubai ruling family’s “build it and they will come”
philosophy has, since the opening of the Jebel Ali free port in 1979, worked
so well. What do you get when you combine expensive infrastructure, the
petrodollar boom, no income tax and freedom to behave as you wish? A land
where expats outnumber locals 10 to one.
Dubai has its
flaws but I do not think any is sufficient to discredit what Sheikh Mohammed
bin Rashid Al Maktoum and his father, Sheikh Rashid, before him have done.
They have not only
been willing to take hefty risks to diversify Dubai’s economy away from oil
but have also adopted a stance of openness that is often unmatched in, for
example, the US. It soon becomes obvious on a visit to Dubai that the US
security alarm last year about DP World, the port operator that on Wednesday
priced its initial public offering at the top of the range, reflected a
shameful ignorance about the UAE.
Dubai’s glaring
weakness is that its fortunes are tied to the price of oil. At
$100 a barrel, there is a property boom and a party every night in the
nightclubs of the Souk Madinat. On paper, the economy is well diversified –
only 5 per cent of gross domestic product comes directly from oil. But its
role as a trade and shipping centre for the Gulf and wider region makes it
dependent on energy in myriad ways.
A second flaw is
that it is culturally absurd. It is hard to stop laughing at Dubai’s oddness
on a first visit. Walk through the Kempinksi hotel by the Mall of the
Emirates and you pass a man in a dishdash (a long, one-piece tunic) pouring
coffee from a shining pot. A few yards past him is the famous indoor ski
slope. Behind that lies every imaginable western store, from Harvey Nichols
to Carrefour.
People from nearby
Abu Dhabi, which disdains ski slopes and is building outposts of the Louvre
and Guggenheim museums on Saadiyat Island, are not alone in regarding Dubai
as shallow and amoral. It lacks gambling but is otherwise a monument to
western pleasure-seeking.
A third flaw is
that it is very stratified. The temporary immigrants who build its
skyscrapers enjoy few rights and have just gone on strike for higher pay
amid a falling dollar and rising inflation. Many businesses are run by
expats and pad payrolls with locals to meet job quotas. One British expat
jibe has it that Emirates stands for “English managed, Indian run, Arabs
taking enormous salaries”.
Natives in many
countries complain of being swamped by immigrants but it happens to be true
in Dubai. As long as the economy rattles along and the expats keep
demonstrating that Dubai needs them, tensions are manageable. But it is easy
to imagine tensions getting out of control in an economic downturn.
In spite of all of
this – even because of some of it – I admire Dubai. Few, if any, other
states have such open borders. Hong Kong and Singapore have built on their
colonial pasts to become international trading and financial centres. The
City of London benefits from being cosmopolitan. But none of them has taken
the plunge so utterly.
In a sense it is
an obvious strategy. My companions in Trader Vic’s were members of an
international elite that grew up after the collapse of the Berlin wall and
the triumph of capitalism. They attended universities and business schools
where nationality was irrelevant and they have more in common with each
other than with many of their own country’s people.
If you have the
money – as Dubai assuredly does – such people are guns for hire. It is as
easy to recruit consultants and bankers to construct a regulatory and legal
system fit for an international financial centre as it is to attract the
engineers to build highways and skyscrapers.
Apart from money,
all it takes is will. Most countries lack it. Politicians have no incentive
to award preferential treatment to a bunch of privileged outsiders. The idea
that the natives will benefit from opening their borders to others who know
more than they do is a tough sell.
There are probably
many Washington politicians who realise that the “war on terror” paranoia
that has closed US borders to many skilled immigrants is misguided, but it
plays in Peoria. Sheikhs have an advantage in this regard: they are not
constrained by democracy.
Even so, it was
not a natural step for an Arab emirate to open itself to the world. It has
produced some odd and some unsettling results but, in the round, it is a
brave and clever economic strategy.
Mix a cocktail and
they will come
Meaningless Asean values
20
November 2007
Never
has the Asean region made so much noise and been so impotent at the same
time.
This
week leaders from across Southeast Asia are meeting in Singapore to mark the
40th anniversary of their Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and
to sign a new charter binding Asean into a European-style community. .
Culturally, the new charter proclaims Southeast Asia to be a single
"community" united by "one vision, one identity". Nonsense, and probably
never possible. Given the extraordinary diversity of the region's 577
million people. Muslim-majority Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei;
Buddhist-majority Thailand, Cambodia, Myanmar and Laos; Christian-majority
Philippines and money driven Singapore. Finding cultural and religious
common ground is no easy task.
The
ASEAN charter sets out a common set of rules for negotiations in trade,
investment, environment and other fields. It aims to turn Southeast Asia
into a single market and production base with a free flow of goods,
services, investment and capital.
The region's leaders are torn between country and community. The talk is
always of the importance of sovereignty and non-interference. There is no
talk of ensuring democracy in their new charter. They pledge to create a
"human rights body" and to deal with any "serious breach" within ASEAN but
there is no discussion of enforcement and no mention of sanctioning or
expelling errant members. Good job too they probably think or Burma/Myanmar
would be long gone. Sadly much touted ASEAN values are really an excuse for
avoiding confrontation and decision making.
Myanmar is a great test of ASEAN which it has largely failed. Countries have
spoken individually if they have said anything at all.
On Monday, the 10
members of ASEAN abruptly withdrew an invitation to U.N. envoy Ibrahim
Gambari to address Asian leaders after Myanmar objected. They further
rejected calls to suspend Myanmar from the bloc to punish the junta's
September crackdown on pro-democracy protesters, and its refusal to free Suu
Kyi.
ASEAN's
Secretary-General Ong Keng Yong insisted the body was not kowtowing to
Myanmar, also known as Burma, by shelving Gambari's scheduled address on
Wednesday. Very unconvincing.
"We don't want to
come across as being too confrontational in a situation like this," Ong
apparently told reporters. Certainly not as confrontational as the Burnese
troops who were beating the monks.
Observers said the
credibility of the Association of South-East Asian Nations had been
shattered by the abrupt cancellation of UN special envoy Ibrahim Gambari's
planned briefing to its leaders on Monday. At a minimum a meeting with
Gambari could have sent a signal that ASEAN was concerned.
Economically, the region needs to get serious about its ambitious goal of an
EU-like "single market" by 2015. Most immediately, protectionist tariffs and
import duties - which have kept trade among ASEAN members at a fraction of
its trade with the rest of the world - must be eliminated.
At the same time, the region must narrow the huge gaps between rich
(Singapore per capita income: US$29,500), poor (Indonesia: $1,600) and
poorest (Myanmar: $200) and between the manufacturing-heavy economies of
Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand and agricultural-based Vietnam, Cambodia
and Laos.
The new charter
may not even get implemented. The pact will collapse if one country fails to
ratify it. The Philippines has warned that its Congress would be
hard-pressed to do so unless Myanmar upholds the charter's principles of
democracy and human rights and releases pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu
Kyi. A strong and welcome lead from Gloria Arroyo.
Emirates slows Aussie expansion
20
November 2007
Emirates Airline
today announced rather less ambitious expansion plans for the Australian
market, announcing plans to boost its flights from 49 a week to 70 by the
end of 2009.
Despite being
granted rights by the Australian Government to fly 70 flights a week by
March 2009 the airline partly blamed the delay in delivery of the Airbus
A380 for the delay to its plans to increase flights into Australia.
Emirates said it
would only start increasing flights in October next year, by adding a second
daily service into Brisbane, using an A340-500. The airline already has
rights to add the service.
Emirates said it
then planned to increase flights to Melbourne to three a day in February
2009, a year later than some expected. After confirming plans to start A380
services into Sydney and Melbourne in 2009, Emirates said it would start a
third daily service into Sydney by late 2009. The increase in flights will
cement Emirates as the second-largest foreign carrier in Australia by seats,
slightly behind Singapore Airlines.
After announcing
last week that it will buy 120 Airbus A350s, 11 extra A380s and 12 Boeing
777-300ERs, Emirates is expected to have ample aircraft to serve the
Australian market.
Too much money
19
November 2007
It is
all about money! Dubai will have the world's richest golf tournament. The
European Golf Tour has announced the season ending Dubai World Championship,
the world's richest tournament worth $10 million in prize money.
This is simply too much money. Golf is
getting too rich; and too expensive to play and watch.
The European Tour
announced plans on Monday for a season-ending tournament in Dubai from 2009.
Offering $1.66 million for the winner, the first Dubai World Championship
will take place from Nov. 19-22 2009 as a climax to the season.
The Dubai World Championship will be held at Jumeirah Golf Estates.
The Tour's Order of Merit will be renamed The Race to Dubai with a prize
pool also of $10 million, and is expected to start in January from 2010
instead of late November on the current calendar.
The first five years of the Tour's new partnership with Leisurecorp, the
company developing Dubai's leading residential golf community, will also see
the building of a new international headquarters for the European Tour's
governing body and the creation of a global property company to develop new
tournament venues around the world.
The inaugural event will run on either the Fire or Earth course, both of
which were designed by Greg Norman.
The agreement signed between Leisurecorp and the European Tour includes an
option to extend for a further five years.
The Chairman of Leisurecorp is Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem (chairman of
Leisurecorp's parent company Dubai World).
As with the current season-ending Volvo Masters at Valderrama in Spain, the
Dubai World Championship will be restricted to the leading 60 players on the
European money list.
The money on offer exceeds what is currently on offer at the four major
tournaments.
The British Open is the richest of those at the moment at $8.6 million, with
the Masters, U.S. Open and U.S. PGA all just under $7 million this year.
Forbes' wasted opportunity
18
November 2007
Steve Forbes is
the Editor-in-Chief of Forbes magazine. But his speech to the Leaders in
Dubai conference in Dubai today was desperately short of both insight and
originality. In the end he resorted to some cheap jibes at the IMF.
It was a very poor
start to the conference. He spoke on China in near glowing terms with barely
a reference to the social cost of China's changes, to China's human rights
abuses and to the lack of any form of democracy.
He then failed to
link the Chinese and Middle East economies in terms of comparisons or
opportunities.
He did with great
arrogance assert that China and other countries which are watching their
currencies plummet should entertain the idea of doing a one-time
re-evaluation of their own money but should remain pegged to the American
dollar. Forbes suggested that the UAE should “keep it (the currency) stable,
keep it fixed.”
He lambasted the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) who he referred to as the IMF Barbarians
for encouraging countries to devalue their dollar. The Asian economic crisis
in the late 1990s can be blamed on the IMF, he said, which told countries
such as Thailand to keep its currency values low. A simplistic analysis that
denies any wrong doing on the part of the collapsed economies of Thailand.
Korea and others.
What should have
been an interesting subject was a regurgitation of known facts, prejudices
and generalisations. Insight. None.
Papers say all is well as fog hits Dubai
17
November 2007
The
usual misleading nonsense from the Gulf News. As the paper reports that
a thick layer of fog blanketed Dubai
on Saturday, reducing visibility to less than 50 metres in some areas.
Visibility was reduced to less
than 50 metres in some areas, the weather bureau said. At Dubai Airport,
visibility was reduced to 300 metres but it did not affect flight
operations.
Oh really; well here are just a
few examples from the airport last night:
Ek 582 to Dhaka at 1.45am left at
5.26am
EK 384 at 3.15am left at 6.47am
EK 135 to Venice leaving at
9.45am will now leave at 13.45pm
Fog occurs because the warm,
moist winds from the Gulf come inland and remain there because there is no
dry breeze from the mountains to push it back out to sea. ANd the airport
does not have Cat III capability. So arrivals and departures are delayed.
Culture Clash
9
November 2007
Air Asia continues
to grow at a remarkable pace and its growth has provided great career
opportunities for young men and women in Malaysia and Thailand. However, the
airline is facing an unusual opposition in its home country. Influential
Malaysian Muslim women demanded on Friday a budget airline to swap its
flight attendants' miniskirts for less revealing, more Islamic attire in
keeping with the multi-faith country's dominant religion.
Female delegates
of the United Malays National Organization (UMNO), during a debate on Islam
at the final day of its week-long annual meeting, zeroed in on AirAsia's
stewardesses, saying their skirts should go down to the ankles.
The
3.3-million-strong UMNO represents the country's dominant ethnic Malays, who
are by definition Muslim. The delegates have stated that the uniform is too
revealing and that since Malaysia is an Islamic nation they are ashamed of
the AirAsia uniform.
AirAsia's crew is
made up of various races, including Malay Muslims who form just over half of
Malaysia's 26 million people.
An AirAsia
spokeswoman said the uniform did not compromise the staff's national
identity and that wearing this uniform does not make its staff less
Malaysian.
The Air Asia
uniform is unlikely to change. The red skirt and jacket are well recognised
and part of the airline's image. The airline has revolutionised flying in
South East Asia but other changes in tradition and culture take longer.
Royal Barge Procession honours the absent King
6
November 2007
Bangkok turned out
in royal yellow yesterday for the 52 barges participating in procession that
honoured the King's 80th birthday and marked the end of the Buddhist Lent. A
rare and spectacular event the procession had an added poignancy this year
due to the absence of the hospitalised King and a nation's concern for his
health.
The procession,
involving 2,098 chanting oarsmen is one of the highlights of this year's
celebrations for His Majesty the King, who has reigned for 60 years and will
be 80 years old on December 5.
The procession
started from Vasukri Pier at Sam Sen and concluded at Wat Arun, the Temple
of the Dawn.
On the
Suphannahongse Royal Barge was HRH Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn, who
took part in the procession on behalf of His Majesty the King.
As the procession
moved past Siriraj Hospital, where His Majesty and his elder sister HRH
Princess Galyani Vadhana are receiving medical treatment, every barge paid
respect to the revered royal members.



The aviation world is coming to Dubai
6
November 2007
Dubai may be small
but it wields a huge influence over the aviation industry. Emirates, along
with the smaller Abu Dhabi based Etihad and Qatar Airways, accounts for one
in 20 of all Airbus and Boeing aircraft on order. More significantly these
airlines are responsible for one in seven of the widebody oder list. These
numbers will only increase as a result of expected announcements at the
Dubai air show.
In addition the
region is becoming one of the most buoyant export markets for business jet
manufacturers, as global corporations and high net worth locals increasingly
charter or buy aircraft to fly into and around the region.
The Dubai air
show, held for the tenth time next week, has become a must-attend for the
aerospace industry. With almost 900 exhibitors - from 200 16 years ago - the
event vies with Singapore for the status of the third biggest air show in
the world after Paris and Farnborough.
The big order, of some $20 billion by Emirates is uncertain and unlikely to
be announced during the five-day show starting from November 11.
However, Boeing and Airbus are expecting to secure orders for 787
Dreamliners and A350 XWBs from other Gulf carriers including Qatar Airways,
Etihad and Air Arabia.
Over 140 aircraft and helicopters will be on display at the airshow, which
runs from November 11-15 at the Airport Expo Dubai. The show will also
feature 11 country pavilions.
The event, which is expected to attract up to 40,000 trade visitors, will
host new-to-market aircraft models ranging from strike fighters to trainers,
from VIP business jets to heavy cargo carriers.
This year's static display will boast its largest ever aircraft showing
including regional debuts from the Cirrus SR22 G3, the Eclipse 500, the
Dassault Falcon 7X, and the Sino Swearingen SJ30.
The flying display will include the Russian MIG 29 multi-role fighter
aircraft and the Lockheed Martin F-16. For Emirates the highlight will be
the Airbus A380, adorned in the company's livery as it makes its return to
the UAE.
The
flying display will feature performances by three of the world's top
aerobatics display team — Britain's Red Arrows flying the BAE Systems' Hawk,
the Patrouille de France in the Dassault/ Dornier AlphaJet, and Spain's
Patrulla Aguila.
The flying display
is from 1.30pm to 4.30 pm on Monday to Friday. The show is open to trade
visitors only. There are no public days.
The indestructible Mr. Thaksin
2
November 2007 - from The Economist
Like Arnold
Schwarzenegger battling the indestructible, shape-shifting cyborg in
“Terminator 2”, the generals who staged Thailand's coup in September 2006
keep blasting at Thaksin Shinawatra's party, Thai Rak Thai (TRT), only to
see it recoalesce and keep chasing them. The party regrouped after the coup,
despite the generals' hopes that it would crumble on losing power. Then, in
May, a tribunal created by the junta ordered TRT's dissolution, barring Mr
Thaksin and 110 other party officials from politics. However, it has simply
morphed into a new group, the People's Power Party (PPP), with the same
popular policies but a new front-man, Samak Sundaravej, a ferocious
right-winger.
Though some
factions have abandoned the new party, it is still expected to win more
seats than any other in the general election, to be held on December 23rd.
At TRT's former headquarters, now the PPP's, Jakrapob Penkair, a party
spokesman, sips hot chocolate from a cup emblazoned with the TRT logo, as he
explains why they chose Mr Samak instead of a more emollient front-man: “We
want a tough guy. Why not? It's a war!”
That Mr Samak is
an arch-royalist also helps, says Mr Jakrapob. The generals, also close to
the palace, accuse Mr Thaksin of showing disrespect to the revered King
Bhumibol. Having Mr Samak on board helps counter such smears. A third,
unstated, reason is that the royalist Mr Samak is a rival of General Prem
Tinsulanonda, the king's chief adviser and, say Thaksinites, the éminence
grise behind the coup.
A PPP win,
followed by Mr Thaksin's vengeful return from exile in Britain, is the
generals' worst nightmare. Would they let it happen? Korn Chatikavanij, a
deputy leader of the Democrats—the second-largest party in the last elected
parliament—reckons there would be no popular support for another coup.
However, this might not stop hardliners from having a try. They have been
attempting to scupper the election by whipping up a crisis over a dodgy land
purchase by General Surayud Chulanont, the interim prime minister.
Press criticism
has forced the army to backtrack on other nefarious schemes, including a
proposed law granting it sweeping powers in any future “emergency” of its
own choosing. But it continues to do what it can to hobble the PPP's
chances. It maintains martial law in many of Mr Thaksin's strongholds in the
populous north-east (though this week it was lifted in some districts). The
army claims its purpose is to suppress drugs-trafficking and illegal
immigration. The PPP says the army has been using martial law as a cover for
intimidating its canvassers.
General Sonthi
Boonyaratglin, who led the coup, has retired as army commander and quit the
Council for National Security, as the junta calls itself. But, as he ponders
entering politics, he has had himself made deputy prime minister with a
brief of ensuring the election's fairness (sic). Mr Samak has produced a
memo—apparently signed by General Sonthi and other junta leaders—discussing
plans to undermine support for the PPP and promote army-approved candidates.
So far, the council has not denied its authenticity. Having grabbed a big
budget increase, the army could probably afford such a campaign.
The election
commission has been widely condemned for absurdly stringent new campaign
rules, under which candidates risk disqualification for such trivial
offences as playing music at their rallies or having posters that are not
quite the approved size. This week it agreed to soften the rules. But it
will only become clear after the election, when it decides on complaints,
how harshly it will enforce them. The commission is ostensibly independent.
But it is hard to avoid suspicions that the rules may be applied selectively
to eliminate successful PPP candidates.
A new
constitution, narrowly passed in a recent referendum, reduces the number of
lower-house seats from 500 to 480. The PPP is unlikely to get the crushing
375 seats its predecessor won in the 2005 elections but pundits reckon it
could win 180 or more. The Democrats should improve on the 96 seats won in
2005. Mr Korn hopes their promises to continue some TRT policies, such as
cheap health care, will win over more voters.
Thitinan
Pongsudhirak, a political scientist, says the PPP may come first but be
forced into opposition, as the Democrats build a majority by allying with
smaller parties. These are mostly an opportunistic rabble of old and new
groups, some of which would be just as happy in alliance with the PPP. Two
new groups that have gathered some momentum are Puea Pandin (the Motherland
Party) and Ruam Jai Thai (Thai Unity), each a curious mixture of ex-Thaksinites
and military hard-nuts. Until later this month, when candidates have to
register, it will not be clear how many viable contestants each party
has—some star politicians are said to be offering themselves to the highest
bidder.
Mr Korn argues
that Democrat-led governments restored stability in the wake of the last
coup, in the early 1990s (which had turned bloody) and after the 1997 Asian
economic crisis. But a fractious coalition, struggling with a weak economy,
and constantly harried by an angry PPP on the opposition benches, might soon
collapse. Mr Thaksin and his party machine—providing they can maintain their
air of invincibility—might be happy to let their foes self-destruct before
returning, stronger and more determined than ever.
The other face of Dubai
1
November 2007 - from Reuters
DUBAI (Reuters) -
Beyond the gleaming towers, busy highways and luxury villas of Dubai,
hundreds of thousands of South Asian labourers who helped build them live in
cramped and dusty industrial zones.
Frustrated by low
wages and long hours, construction workers in the Gulf Arab trade hub have
long complained about the poor working conditions that lie behind Dubai's
spectacular building boom. This week, those protests turned violent.
"They turned over
police cars, and the police showed up and they created problems with them,"
said an Egyptian labourer who declined to give his name.
"They are asking
for higher wages... They stopped working suddenly. They stopped cars. The
police arrived to stop them from closing down the road and (they) assaulted
the police. The police besieged the camp, and picked up ... workers and
(charged them)."
The Gulf News
daily reported on Thursday that of some 5,000 workers were rounded up during
the protests on Saturday, some 800 were still in custody. It quoted the
police chief, Dahi Khalfan Tamim, as saying that workers involved in
vandalising police vehicles and public property would be prosecuted.
Dubai, one of
seven emirates in the United Arab Emirates, has long faced criticism from
international human rights groups who say it turns a blind eye to the
non-payment of wages, lack of medical care and sub-standard housing for
workers.
Foreigners,
including labourers and middle and high-income executives, comprise over 85
percent of the UAE's 4 million population.
Labourers in
coloured overalls can be seen toiling on the construction sites that dot
Dubai, which has used cash from record oil prices to build ambitious
developments including the world's tallest building and three palm-shaped
islands as well as a man-made archipelago shaped like a map of the world.
The government has
revised the labour law in recent months to include requirements that
employers pay for migrant workers' travel, employment permits, medical tests
and health care.
The government has
also closed down some workers' camps that do not meet minimal health and
safety standards in an effort to crack down on companies that abuse migrant
workers.
But in March, New
York-based watchdog Human Rights Watch said a UAE draft labour law fell far
short of international standards for the rights of workers.
"The problem was
the salary, because our salary (is) not very much," one Pakistani labourer
said in broken English. "Not much ... maybe one ... hundred (dollars). So,
this is a big problem."
Some problems
begin in the workers' home countries, where they are recruited with false
promises of good pay to send home.
Many are
illiterate and cannot read the contracts they sign before they go. In Dubai,
many labourers end up living in crowded rooms they share in camps run by
their employers. Some have their passports held by employers to stop them
running away.
The United States,
which is negotiating a free trade pact with the UAE, is pressing the Gulf
Arab state to apply international standards to its workforce.
But while the UAE
has vowed to punish firms that do not pay employees on time or force them to
live or work in poor conditions, labour unions remain illegal and protests
can often end in deportation.
"Some will be
deported, the ones that made trouble will go back to their countries,"
another Egyptian worker said.
"Those that are
working and haven't caused any problems will be released from jail and
return to work."
Emirates
vice chairman denies global warming
1
November 2007
Emirates Vice - Chairman Maurice Flanagan is prone to speaking first and
thinking later. His out of touch observations in Singapore on global warming
are self serving and based on all the available evidence, wrong.
AFP reported from
Singapore that Flanagan rubbished Nobel Peace Prize winner Al Gore's
Oscar-winning documentary on climate change, saying he did not believe the
film's scientific theory on global warming.
"Don't talk to me
about global warming... I just do not buy it whatsoever," he said at a
regional aviation conference (CAPA) in Singapore.
"Al Gore's
'Inconvenient Truth' is absolute rubbish," added Flanagan, who said he had
watched the documentary three times.
The 2006
documentary, which won former US vice president Gore the Nobel Peace Prize
last month, details scientific theory about global warming and its impact.
The aviation
industry has been listed by some as among the main contributors of carbon
dioxide emissions which are blamed for global warming.