rascott.com  "news, views, travel and an occasional blog"

 

 

June 2005 archive

Feedback:by email   

Home
Up
May 2005 Archive

 

Click for Dubai, UAE Forecast

Other Useful links

World Time Clock Exchange Rates Nationsonline.org
Amnesty International
Reporters w/o borders
Sister Joan - Bangkok

BKK Magazine

The opinions expressed on these pages are entirely personal unless they are credited; you may not agree with all, or anything, that I write. So please use the feedback page to respond, comment or berate me.

 

 

 

 

An Irish lesson for Thailand

30 June 2005

There is no simple one size fits all solution for economic management but in the following article Thomas Friedman outlines how Ireland has moved in four decades from basket case to most envied nation. Most of the solutions are simple. Transparency is key. Allow foreign companies to compete; give them access to talented people. Eliminate corruption at all levels; separate big business from political control. De-politicize economic development.

Thailand sits on the ocean wonderfully placed between SE Asia and China. The country has great natural resources; a young work force and a decent power, water and road infrastructure. Great progress has been made but it is held back by the lack of a clear message; by corruption scandals; by lack of investment in education and by an economy that is not a level playing field for all.

The end of the rainbow

Thomas L. Friedman; The New York Times

Here's something you probably didn't know: Ireland today is the richest country in the European Union after Luxembourg.

Yes, the country that for hundreds of years was best known for emigration, tragic poets, famines, civil wars and leprechauns today has a per capita gross domestic product higher than that of Germany, France and Britain. How Ireland went from the sick man of Europe to the rich man in less than a generation is an amazing story. It tells you a lot about Europe today: All the innovation is happening on the periphery by those countries embracing globalization in their own ways - Ireland, Britain, Scandinavia and Eastern Europe - while those following the French-German social model are suffering high unemployment and low growth.

Ireland's turnaround began in the late 1960s when the government made secondary education free, enabling a lot more working-class kids to get a high school or technical degree. As a result, when Ireland joined the EU in 1973, it was able to draw on a much more educated work force.

By the mid-1980s, though, Ireland had reaped the initial benefits of EU membership - subsidies to build better infrastructure and a big market to sell into. But it still did not have enough competitive products to sell, because of years of protectionism and fiscal mismanagement. The country was going broke, and most college grads were emigrating.

"We went on a borrowing, spending and taxing spree, and that nearly drove us under," said Deputy Prime Minister Mary Harney. "It was because we nearly went under that we got the courage to change."

And change Ireland did. In a quite unusual development, the government, the main trade unions, farmers and industrialists came together and agreed on a program of fiscal austerity, slashing corporate taxes to 12.5 percent, far below the rest of Europe, moderating wages and prices, and aggressively courting foreign investment. In 1996, Ireland made college education basically free, creating an even more educated work force.

The results have been phenomenal. Today, 9 out of 10 of the world's top pharmaceutical companies have operations here, as do 16 of the top 20 medical device companies and 7 out of the top 10 software designers. Last year, Ireland got more foreign direct investment from America than from China. And overall government tax receipts are way up.

"We set up in Ireland in 1990," Michael Dell, founder of Dell Computer, explained to me via e-mail. "What attracted us? (A) well-educated work force - and good universities close by. (Also,) Ireland has an industrial and tax policy which is consistently very supportive of businesses, independent of which political party is in power. I believe this is because there are enough people who remember the very bad times to de-politicize economic development. (Ireland) also has very good transportation and logistics and a good location - easy to move products to major markets in Europe quickly."

Finally, added Dell, "they're competitive, want to succeed, hungry and know how to win. Our factory is in Limerick, but we also have several thousand sales and technical people outside of Dublin. The talent in Ireland has proven to be a wonderful resource for us. Fun fact: We are Ireland's largest exporter."

Intel opened its first chip factory in Ireland in 1993. James Jarrett, a vice president, said Intel was attracted by Ireland's large pool of young educated men and women, low corporate taxes and other incentives that saved Intel roughly a billion dollars over 10 years. National health care didn't hurt, either. "We have 4,700 employees there now in four factories, and we are even doing some high-end chip designing in Shannon with Irish engineers," Jarrett said.

In 1990, Ireland's total work force was 1.1 million. This year it will hit two million, with no unemployment and 200,000 foreign workers (including 50,000 Chinese). Others are taking notes. Prime Minister Bertie Ahern said: "I've met the premier of China five times in the last two years."

Ireland's advice is very simple: Make high school and college education free; make your corporate taxes low, simple and transparent; actively seek out global companies; open your economy to competition; speak English; keep your fiscal house in order; and build a consensus around the whole package with labor and management - then hang in there, because there will be bumps in the road - and you, too, can become one of the richest countries in Europe.

"It wasn't a miracle, we didn't find gold," said Mary Harney. "It was the right domestic policies and embracing globalization."

Time to reassess Mao

30 June 2005

Mao Zedong's portrait looms large over Tianenmen Square. His mausoleum is at the centre of the square. His face is on the country's bank notes. His communist ideology is still given credence by the current leaders.

Mao and his communist ideology are both out of place in modern China. And it may be that authors Jung Chang and John Halliday's new biography of Mao ("Mao; the unknwon story") is the key to a reassessment of Mao's place in modern China.

Many Chinese fled Mao and the communist threat to head for Taiwan and Hong Kong and overseas. They are proud of being ethnically Chinese. It is the party and its history that scares them. This book, after ten years of research and writing, re-writes modern history.

Mao instilled obedience through fear. During his rule modern estimates are that 27 million people died in the work camps, where they were sent to reform their bourgeois habits; some 38 million died of starvation and related sickness in the infamous and misnamed Great Leap forward from 1958 to 1961 and millions more in the Cultural Revolution of 1965 to 1976.

One of the best arguments against Mao is what has happened in China since he died. Spurred on initially by the reforms of Deng Xiao-ping, China has enjoyed a real Great Leap Forward, without tyranny and without wanton death and destruction.

As the Chinese ask Japan to reconsider its history it is time for China to do the same. Modern China exists because of the will of the people to live, to trade, to catch up and to forge ahead.

No country can be at ease with itself that does not look its own history straight in the eye. And it can only be hoped that this book will one day be read widely inside China.

 200 years

29 June 2005

It is a little surreal to wake up in a Beijing hotel room at 5am, to turn on CNN and to be watching a live re-enactment of the 200 year old Battle of Trafalgar. Weapons then were cannon balls and muskets. The 19th century belonged to Europe; the 20th century shifted that power to America; the 21st century moves that power to China. But is China ready to assume that responsibility? Are nations like India able to provide the checks and balances to China's headlong rush to world power.

200 years ago - say 8 generations ago - was still before the Industrial Revolution. Britannia ruled the waves; empire was still in relative infancy. 100 years later the motor car was just about to be invented and the Wright brothers had flown 100 yards. The new revolution is in information, the use of technology and the use and abuse of power.

The question is what happens in the next 100 years? What foundations are we laying down now that will shape the future? Or will we simply drive ourselves to extinction.

The dependence upon oil has to change. The motor car must become obsolete; there will have to be new forms of transportation. Maybe cities will become increasingly obsolete as we move to home working  and outsourcing.

Communication will become simpler - the keyboard interface to the pc is already obsolete.  Will we have the equivalent of a universal translator; your own personal  earpiece that allows two people who do not speak a common language to be able to interact without the need for a human translator.

In 100 years we will probably not be living solely on this planet. Man explores, man colonises, but will he do it peacefully, or will space conquest lead to the same nationalism and war as in the 20th century.

What is the impact of smaller families and rapidly aging populations? What will it mean for our retirement years. Will we ever be able to retire. In the last 50 years around the world family sizes have shrunk as people delay or simply ignore parenthood. How will we be written in the history books. Will our technology look as obsolete now as Nelson's cannons look from 200 years ago?

A very Thai tragedy

25 June 2005

It is a very Thai tragedy; Greek tragedies at least had pathos and some semblance of good and bad. In the following story there is little evidence of good. It is a classic tale or power, politics, mistresses, abuse and death. A tale of everyday life in the land of smiles. Sadly the truth is unlikely ever to be told for reason's explained below by the girl's father.

On Wednesday of this week a Thai Rak Thai MP from Udon Thani, Atthapol Sanitwongchai fell to his death from the condominium kept for his student girlfriend, Wassana Sunnee. Police have not yet determined whether his death was murder, suicide or an accident. They do believe that the lovers had a fight.

Prime Minister and Thai Rak Thai leader Thaksin Shinawatra, and the late MP's father, ex-MP Chalermpol Sanitwongchai, believed Atthapol was not the kind of person who would commit suicide.

Ten witnesses have been questioned. Video footage from closed-circuit cameras showed that at the time of the MPs death there was no one else in the condo unit other than the MP and his girlfriend.

Certainly the mysterious death of the girlfriend is making it hard to investigate and confirm the reasons for the MP's death.

Wassana's, who was 25, had lived with Atthapol for six years as a mistress. Her father says that she sometimes complained to her sister that the MP was jealous.

The father has suggested that his daughter killed herself due to stress after a day-long police questioning and having no one to console her. It appears that she was not given access to a lawyer; and despite presumably being more than a little traumatised at her lover and sponsor's death she was given no police escort of counseling help to take her home.

To add to her stress members of Attaphol's family, including his father, came to the apartment to claim his belongings. When she allegedly launched herself from the apartment balcony there were four other people in the room. All say that they had turned away from where she was standing and claim not to have witnessed Wassana's fall.

What was said to her by the family; why did Attaphol's father allegedly offer her money. Why was a girl left apparently suicidal after a day of such high emotion. The police and the family appear to have knowingly or otherwise applied a huge amount of pressure on this girl.

During dinner earlier that night witnesses have suggested that Attaphol and Wassana had driven back to the apartment leaving had left his chauffeur, Phichet, to pay the bill; they also say that Atthapol had slapped his driver in the face during dinner due to his belief that the chauffeur was having an affair with Wassana. Phichet was forced to leave his mobile phone at the restaurant as a guarantee after failing to cover the bill with cash - an account confirmed by waiting staff at the restaurant.

Security guards at the condominium said they saw Phichet arrive at the scene in a taxi 15 minutes after Attaphol's fall.

It also appears that Wassana and Atthapol had fought at the apartment, evidenced by the girl's bruises on her face and a cut to her lips which were seen on television after she left from police questioning.

Chao, Wassana's father, said rather sadly that "it's useless for ants like us to fight with elephants. Let bygones by bygones. Now they [Attaphol and Wassana] are together again."

No Thai Rak Thai MPs or party representatives had attended Wassana's funeral service at Wat Pa Samakkhee Nong Kaew in Udon Thani's Muang district. About 30 of Wassana's friends and relatives attended the service.

Atthapol leave a common law wife and three year old child, and according to his father a number of other girlfriends.

Tsunami - six months on....

20 June 2005

On 8 June (see below) I was giving the Canadians a hard time for failing to deliver on their Tsunami promises. But actually it is the Australian's who are falling woefully short and who are jeopardising their relations hip with Indonesia and their role in Asia.

Reuters Alertnet service provides an updates monitoring service of Tsunami aid pledged and received. It can be found here.

Microsoft's China censorship; localisation or capitulation?

16 June 2005

Microsoft grew rapidly to be a great company because it is an American company; because market forces, education, freedom of action and opportunity all gave the company's founders the opportunity to grow unshackled by politics.

It is therefore particularly depressing to see Microsoft so readily agree to censoring the Chinese version of its blog tool, "MSN spaces". The system automatically rejecting words including "democracy" and "Dalai Lama". When a Chinese blogger attempts to post a message containing terms such as "democracy", "Dalai Lama", "Falungong", "4 June" (the date of the Tiananmen Square massacre), "China + corruption", or "human rights", a warning displays saying, "This message contains a banned expression, please delete this expression."

How far is Microsoft willing to go to collaborate with the Chinese authorities? If the authorities asked Microsoft to provide information about Chinese cyberdissidents using its services that it would agree to do so, on the basis that it is was legally obliged to do so.?

Generally "subversive" messages are displayed on Chinese-hosted forums and blogs but the banned words are automatically replaced with blank spaces.

The Chinese version of the MSN portal, along with the blog tool, were launched as a joint venture with a local state-controlled company, Shanghai Alliance Investment Ltd (SAIL).

The Chinese authorities are trying to impose self-censorship on all search engines and blog tools that that wish to operate on its territory. Microsoft is following Yahoo !, which was the first, agreed to remove all "subversive" news and information from its search results.

Microsoft's argument is that with despite the filters they are helping millions of people communicate, share stories, share photographs and build relationships. But please do not offend the non-elected authorities or question issues of history, unless  the authorities have launched their own campaign, such as the recent anti-Japanese rallies.
 

Here is the problem: is there a workable alternative? The Chinese market is too big for Microsoft and others to close up operations in that country, or to face litigation from the government. Microsoft wishes to be a blog host in a land with billions of eyeballs—rewriting foreign public policy is not part of the business plan. Boycotting China would be a noble choice. But simply ignoring Chinese law would just stir up international friction to little positive effect.

So is this adapting to local laws bona fide and necessary localisation or is it capitulation?

Jacko not guilty - told you so !!

14 June 2005

The court in Santa Barbara, California, found Michael Jackson not guilty on all charges. Frankly he is only guilty of poor judement and of being very poorly advised.

Sorry, but grown men do not share their bed with young boys who are not their sons; it is as simple as that.

Back in March I wrote " This money grabbing show trial should never have got to court and appears likely to end in a not guilty verdict that will only show what a farce the system is." I hate to be smug but I told you so !

Not that this will do much to help Jackson's weird image; allegations like these will stick for ever; whatever the jury verdict.

In this case the jury clearly has told the prosecution that this was a case that probably should not have brought.

Now that the trial is over i would be appropriate for Jackson to admit to some of these mistakes; a little humility would be a good part of his re-building and re-branding.

It was a seedy trial; which is why the US media loved the case. Now the jury are the celebrities as they explain there verdict. It is time for everyone involved to stop talking about the trial and to move on.

It's not Jacko that is wacko; it's the system
15 March 2005

 

The so-called "trial of the century" in California - Case No 1133603, the People v Michael Joe Jackson - was always going to be a circus. It is worse than circus, it is farce.

It is a grubby, sordid, American story where everyone wants their moment of fame; everyone wants to feed at the same trough.

The singers' teenage accuser has now said that he twice told a school official that the pop star never molested him. All the defense needs to do is establish reasonable doubt. The judge should throw the case out now and send the money grabbing family, the parasitic lawyers and the media pariahs home. Better still, Larry King will have to find something interesting to bore us all with.

The prosecution has described Jackson as a sexual predator who molested the cancer stricken boy or a poof family from when he was 13. Jackson's defense lawyer calls him the victim of a celebrity-obsessed family seeking money. When the gravy train dried up the family contacted two lawyers, one of whom had arranged a $20 million settlement for another boy who made sexual claims against Jackson in 1993.

It is voyeurism and celebrity worship gone mad. We are getting a peek at a world that none of us should want to be a part of. This money grabbing show trial should never have got to court and appears likely to end in a not guilty verdict that will only show what a farce the system is.

The Milkshake Murder

13 June 2005

The eight week long trial of Nancy Kissel has started in Hong Kong. Ms. Kissel and her Merrill Lynch investor husband lived in Parkview, an exclusive and expensive tower block on top of the hills of Hong Kong island, often shrouded in mists and cloud in Hong Kong's winter months.

Ms. Kissel killed her husband; either pre-meditated or in self defense - that is for the court to determine.

The prosecution alleges that the American woman gave her husband a sedatives-laced strawberry milkshake before beating him to death with a heavy metal ornament.

Hong Kong's media loves this story; a Chinese reporter commented that: “For us, this case is a throwback to the colonial era. It has all the ingredients our readers are most interested in - sex, murder, gweilos (Cantonese slang for white foreigners) and lots and lots of money.”

Her husband, Robert Kissel was 40 years old and a senior executive with Merrill Lynch investment banker. He had amassed nearly 6 million US dollars in bonuses since being poached from Goldman Sachs by Merrill Lynch and was about to promoted to a top job in Tokyo. The prosecution claimed that the couple’s 14-year marriage crumbled during the SARS crisis in Hong Kong in 2003 when Nancy returned to the family’s multi-million dollar home in Vermont with their children and allegedly struck up an affair with TV repair man Michael del Priore. Kissel had hired private detectives to expose his wife's affair. He had also installed spyware on his wife’s laptop which showed how she did Internet searches for sleeping pills and “overdose medicine causing heart attack”, the court heard.

One evening in November 2003 Mrs. Kissel apparently gave him a milkshake laced with sleeping pills as he watched an American football game. He was then bludgeoned repeatedly with a metal statuette in an attack so frenzied that the base of the statuette snapped off, Hong Kong’s High Court heard.

Prosecutors say that the wife was the sole beneficiary of US$6.7 million dollars in insurance policies.

Mrs. Kissel denies murder and is expected to claim that her husband was drunk, not drugged, on the day of the killing. She told police she killed him when he tried to force her to have sex with him and threatened her with a baseball bat.

A team of lawyers arguing her case are expected to paint a picture of a womanising, hard-drinking and sometimes violent husband whose behaviour drove Kissel to seek comfort in the arms of a “commoner” who loved her.

This hardly sounds like a man who was drinking strawberry milkshakes.

Canada's failed commitments

8 June 2005

Five months ago South and South East Asia were starting to pick up the pieces after the year end's devastating tsunami. This week scientists are raising the alarm of massive earthquakes and the potential for another  tsunami based on their studies of regional seismic activity.

Five months ago government ministers from every capital on earth were announcing on CNN every 10 minutes more and more millions of relief aid. What ahs happened since.

In May it was reported that five hundred containers, representing one-quarter of all aid sent to Sri Lanka were still sitting on the dock in Colombo, unclaimed or unprocessed.

At the Indonesian port of Medan, 1,500 containers of aid were still sitting on the dock. There are many more examples.

So why pick on the Canadians. For deception basically. In January Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin flew into Sri Lanka to pledge multi millions aid. Bush was on his ranch and Blair on his vacation. But Prime Minister Martin walked along the ravaged coast of Kalumnai and was, reported Canada's CTV network, "visibly shaken."  Martin boldly committed Canada to giving $425 million to tsunami relief. "Mr. Paul Martin Has Set A Great Example For The Rest Of The World Leaders!" raved the LankaWeb news service.

So how much of that $425 million has been spent so far? Not a lot. The Government says that $90 million has been released to Canadian non-governmental organizations (NGOs) for projects that will support relief and rehabilitation work in communities. Note that the money has gone to Canadian NGOs. Much of it is still in Ottawa. Canada enjoys a reputation as the perfect global citizen, renowned for its commitment to the U.N. and multilateralism. But Canada's contribution to tsunami relief is fraudulent.

Martin's visit to Sri Lanka and pledged aid looks like the photo-opportunity of a man whose political support is withering.

So I wrote to the Tsunami Secretariat of the Canadian International Development Agency to ask what was going on - the following (unedited) is their reply. So there appears to be a further C$335million to spend. Or maybe the commitment was never real anyway.

Dear Mr. Scott,

Thank you for your recent email dated May 19th, 2005 regarding Canada's contribution to immediate and long-term assistance to people affected by the Indian Ocean tsunami. As you may know, the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) is leading Canada's response to the relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction phases of the tsunami affected areas. The Canadian government has committed $425 million over five years toward a comprehensive response to the Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami. These funds will be used for relief and rehabilitation ($265 million), as well as reconstruction ($160 million) in the most affected countries.

While relief, rehabilitation, and reconstruction activities can overlap, they are considered as distinct phases:

· humanitarian relief concentrates on mainly short-term and temporary activities to ensure that the basic needs of people are immediately met (e.g. emergency food, clean water, shelter, etc.);

· rehabilitation entails restoring local services related to the provision of immediate needs (e.g. sanitation, power, transportation, law and order, etc.);

· reconstruction represents longer-term development assistance which would help people in the affected areas rebuild their lives and meet their own current and future needs.

As part of its initial contribution, Canada allocated over $53 million for relief to both UN agencies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Canadian embassies and high commissions in the affected countries also made $1.5 million available to help them respond quickly to initiatives proposed by local organizations. In addition, the Canadian government offered a debt moratorium to affected countries.

To date, close to $90 million has been released to Canadian non-governmental organizations (NGOs) for projects that will support relief and rehabilitation work in communities affected by the tsunami. This funding, delivered through CIDA, comes from the $425 million set aside for Canada's response to the tsunami disaster.

Furthermore, CIDA recently released its reconstruction strategies for Indonesia and Sri Lanka, two countries affected greatly by the tsunami. As such, CIDA is currently assessing various proposals it has received that aim to address the long-term reconstruction concerns for tsunami victims and, as you mentioned in your email, is supporting an Asia Development Bank (ADB) initiative in Indonesia. This reconstruction initiative is but one of many that CIDA will support in the coming months. For further information concerning all tsunami-related projects that CIDA supports (including project descriptions), please visit http://www.acdi-cida.gc.ca/cida_ind.nsf/vall/9260546B62CCC90A85256FF100663F23?OpenDocument

I hope this addresses your concerns. Please feel free to contact us should you have any further queries.

Best Regards,

Tsunami Secretariat Canadian International Development Agency

200 Promenade du Portage, Hull, Quebec Canada K1A 0G4

Bush's pathetic pledge

8 June 2005

Most of the US media seems impressed that US President Bush committed to $674 million in emergency aid for Africa and missed the point that Congress had already approved for needy countries.

Tony Blair is trying to line up pledges to double overall aid for Africa over the next 10 years. That is an extra $25 billion a year.  Before getting to Washington, Mr. Blair had done very well, securing pledges of large increases from European Union members. But his plans for Africa will only succeed with strong and visible US support.

Yet, the USA spends well under a quarter of 1 percent of its budget on aid to Africa. Indeed the USA gives just 0.16 percent of its national income to help poor countries, despite signing a United Nations declaration three years ago in which rich countries agreed to increase their aid to 0.7 percent by 2015. Since then, Britain, France and Germany have all announced plans for how to get to 0.7 percent; America has not.

What is 0.7 percent of the American economy? About $80 billion. That is about the amount the Senate just approved for additional military spending, mostly in Iraq. It's not remotely close to the $140 billion corporate tax cut last year.

Bush has a tremendous high profile opportunity to be seen to be doing the right thing and to be seen to be supporting the long-suffering Tony Blair. People genuinely want to see change in Africa. Rich countries are mounting a worthy effort to make poverty history. But the Bush administration is showing itself to be completely out of touch by offering such a miserly drop in the bucket.

 

Live8's bold aims and hypocrisies

1 June 2005

Sir Bob Geldorf's energies are remarkable. Twenty years after Live Aid he is still campaigning. The trouble is we have all become twenty years more cynical. Live Aid was fun, Live Aid was energising; Live Aid in reality changed little.

The focus of the G8 nations is less on crippling poverty but on fighting people who do not want western affluence or politics and who are willing to fly airplanes into buildings and who employ extreme terror

The Live8 tag to "make poverty history" sounds too much like a Nike slogan. It is all too easy to imagine linguistically challenged pop celebrities telling us that "that poverty is, like, really bad and stuff.." before they get into their limo and leave the concerts for their five star hotels...

Their are many dangers with these concerts and the walk to Edinburgh and the G8 meeting. Previous G8 meetings have seen massive and violent protests from anti-globalisation groups. The march to Edinburgh to support he Live8 campaign could easily become a protest vehicle for all anti-government and ant-establishment crusades.

The issues are being woefully over-simplified into sound bites and slogans. Politics is complicated. It can be dull and difficult, and there are rarely easy answers that can be reduced to a wristband slogan.

The response to 'make poverty history' should simply be 'how?' And the answer isn't going to be straightforward and it's going to turn a lot of people off. Geldorf and others will argue that people need to be more aware of global poverty. In these days of mass and instant communication people have probably been never more aware - but in the worlds of the original Band Aid song - they "thank God its them instead of you." The danger is that the message gets dumbed down so much that it does not mean anything.

Drop the debt, make poverty history; this sounds right but the real change will come from those with political power engaging with the issues in all their complexity, rather than simply making us all feel just a little bit responsible.

Live 8 is targeting the G8 leaders. But change in Africa will not happen unless the leaders of Africa buy into change and lead the war on poverty. And for many of them their own wealth and their own security comes from holding wealth in a very narrow ruling group.

The March should be to Kampala or to Addis Ababa. Now that would have an impact. How many of the performing stars have been there. How many but freetrade products and not designer junk.

The greater majority of us work hard to feed ourselves and those around us. Many of us quietly do our bit for causes that we care about; there is something irritating about multi-millionaires telling us to stop being so bloody selfish, telling us that the world is full of inequality (we know, believe me)  and to give more.

Raising awareness about problems of poverty in Africa can never be a bad thing. As the outstanding article, reproduced below from the UK's Independent newspaper says there are things we can do for Africa apart from give it money. Or rather, there are damaging things we can stop doing and barriers we can remove to give Africa a real chance to earn its living in the world and develop.
 

Cynical politicians, pipedreams - and how we can make a difference
By Richard Dowden, The Independent

01 June 2005

"Seize ye first the political kingdom!" said Kwame Nkrumah, the prophet of African independence and Ghana's first leader. That was more than 50 years ago and his advice has been followed diligently by every politically ambitious African man ever since.

The few who got to the top of Africa's greasy political pole - no woman has yet made it - have seized it and held on tight, usually until pushed off by force.

Africa's winner-takes-all politics lies at the heart of everything that has gone wrong with Africa. It is the reason why it has fallen behind the rest of the world economically, the reason for its wars and poverty. Its roots go back to the creation of African states themselves, the lines drawn on maps by the European powers at the end of the 19th century, that became 40-odd states overlaying some 10,000 societies and political entities.

Take Nigeria for example. Like Europe it has three big tribes and several other ethnic groups, 25 in the case of Europe, more than 400 in the case of Nigeria. Imagine a united European state - united by force not by referendum - which has to elect one president, one government. A Europe in which the French are Muslim, the Germans Catholic, the British Protestant and there is only one source of income, oil, and it is under the Germans. And where - if anyone mentions putting their own people first or forming an alliance with another ethnic group - they are accused of being tribalist and endangering the future of the state.

With a few exceptions African states have no common understanding or experience of nationhood. Their flags, their national anthems, their identities were created by outsiders. Patriotism in the good sense is in short supply.

If you want power, you play the ethnic card or rubbish your religious rivals. And when you have power, you bring your own people into government, and - even more importantly - into the army. The state treasury increasingly becomes a private bank account and when you run for election the entire state structure and all its officials are at your disposal. If anyone inside the continent says anything, you accuse them of interfering in internal affairs. If anyone outside Africa criticises, you accuse them of racism and neo-colonialism. It's a simple formula that has worked brilliantly for Robert Mugabe and many others.

Those new to Africa are often struck by a paradox. Firstly how individualistic and cynical African politicians are. Secondly how communal and hopeful most Africans are. There seems to be little connection or even shared values between rulers and ruled.

Despite Africa's dysfunctional political culture, some countries have worked. Botswana has been coup-free and relatively corruption-free. The presidency has passed through three safe pairs of hands.

Tanzania remains virtually a one-party state but the recent election of a new presidential candidate by the ruling party was as democratic as it gets.

Ghana and Senegal have both changed governments through elections. Yet none of them are free from problems of regional or ethnic discontent; Botswana with the San Bushmen, Tanzania with Zanzibar and Senegal and Ghana with minorities that feel excluded.

Others have looked as if they were coming right but then seem to have fallen back into old problems. Uganda under Yoweri Museveni has been the darling of the aid-giving governments for years with more than half its budget coming from aid. But now he seems determined to change the constitution to extend his rule. A report commissioned by the World Bank found that it has turned into a corrupt one-party state and recommends that direct budget support to Uganda be stopped.

Kenya where the corrupt old regime of Daniel arap Moi was replaced in a stunning election victory for an opposition alliance, has become even more corrupt than before. Then there are the big holes on the map: Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan - ruled in great parts by local barons and warlords and where there is no democracy despite, in Nigeria's case, having had elections.

Given this, the prospect of turning Africa around with aid and debt relief seems at best doubtful, at worst a pipedream.

Uganda presents a terrible dilemma. To punish Mr Museveni by cutting aid could mean we hurt millions of Ugandans who are beginning at last to see real change in their lives. The country is so dependent on aid that dropping it would risk destroying the economic gains it has made in recent years. Mr Museveni knows the donors well and their moral scruples. He will take huge risks with his country's future to stay in power. Will he, after all he has achieved, throw it all away? As they used to say of Mr Moi in Kenya: "If you are the only one on the teat, it does not matter how thin the cow gets."

Yet these hard-boiled calculations do not enter the soft world of Live Aid concerts and the campaigns for debt relief and more aid. This aid agency-driven agenda creates the illusion that the hungry African child they use in their fund-raising propaganda can be directly reached by your money. Give, and the child will receive. In this world there are no cynical rulers, no corrupt governments, no nasty armies. Instead there are governments whose only constraint are the funds which, if they did not have to spend them servicing debt, they would spend on food, medicine and school books for that child.

I was delighted yesterday when Bob Geldof said he did not want your money - just your support, because there are things we can do for Africa apart from give it money. Or rather, there are damaging things we can stop doing and barriers we can remove to give Africa a real chance to earn its living in the world and develop.

Firstly, we can fight to end the agricultural subsidies for farmers in Europe, America and Japan that keep world prices low and squeeze African commodities out the market. And end the export subsidies that allow cheap food to be dumped in Africa destroying African markets. High tariffs keeping out African goods need to be cut, but African countries need a bit of time before reciprocating the removal of trade barriers, as they have no safety nets to protect workers who lose their jobs.

Secondly, we could look closely at the outside dimension to corruption in Africa. Britain has resisted signing up to the UN Convention on Corruption and British companies are fighting regulations that would make them responsible for corrupt practices by their agents as well as their own staff. London looks to be the laundry of choice when it comes to laundering African corruption money - and although the reporting regulations have been tightened up, few reports from banks about suspicious funds are followed up by the Financial Services Authority unless they are related to drugs or terrorism.

Thirdly, we have to stop encouraging the brain-drain from Africa. There are said to be more Malawian nurses in Birmingham than in Malawi, a country ravaged by Aids. It is not about a ban, but maybe finding ways of turning the ebb and flow of skills into a win-win rather than a win-lose, as it is at the moment.

Fourthly, the arms and mines that kill in Africa's wars are mostly made in the former Soviet Union, but the dealers are mostly in London and the deals are made in the City. They are not licensed or regulated in any way.

Fifthly, Britain has got to do something about its immigration policy. Thousands of Africans living in Britain - or trying to come here for study or to visit relatives - are left with an impression of Britain somewhat at odds with Tony Blair's passion for Africa. I spent a day and half trying to get a visa for a well-known Ugandan MP, who was scheduled to speak at a meeting I was organising. Not even the intervention by our new Minister for Africa, Lord Treisman, could move the Home Office to deliver it in time.

All these were touched on in the Commission for Africa report. At its launch Tony Blair said the report's recommendations were now British policy. Is he serious? If so then the Queen's speech should have made reference to these issues, some of which require parliamentary time and legislation. But the mentions of Africa in the Queen's speech were vague and exhortatory.

Most important of all, we need to make a long-term commitment to Africa and spend more resources trying to understand how it works. The Government needs advice on how to call those difficult political decisions. Africa has been handed over to the expanding Department for International Development where knowledge of development theory is deep but experience of African political realities is thin or non-existent.

Meanwhile cuts at the Foreign Office is allowing it to shed its African experts like dead leaves. One day we may regret it.

Richard Dowden is director of the Royal Africa Society and was the first Africa editor of 'The Independent'

A continent stricken by poverty

* Income per person in the poorest countries in Africa has fallen by 25 per cent in the past 20 years. Those countries' share of world trade has fallen by almost half since 1981 and is now 0.4 per cent.

* The world's three richest people control more wealth than all 600 million people in the world's poorest countries.

* 2.8 billion people - nearly half the world's population - live on less than £1.20 per day. One in five survives on less than 65p per day.

* More than 10 million children die of hunger and preventable diseases each year - one child every three seconds, while 25 million in sub-Saharan Africa are infected with HIV or Aids. Each day 8,500 people - of whom 1,600 are children - die from HIV-related illnesses.